I would assume that the minimum any bid would need is...

(a) cash to cover the football debt to be paid asap (7-8million)
(b) enough working capital to last the season
(c) a backhander to KPMG

then any extra can go to the previous creditors


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mark Humphries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Alick Stott'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'John Boocock'" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'LEEDS LIST'" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: [LU] Rumours


> Ok, that makes sense.  I hope KPMG don't put a 2 week deadline or 
> something
> for bids, let's get this fiasco over and done with and get back to the
> fiasco on the pitch.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Alick Stott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: 04 July 2007 15:28
>> To: Mark Humphries; 'John Boocock'; 'LEEDS LIST'
>> Subject: Re: [LU] Rumours
>>
>> Mark - I think that KPMG will own all the shares in the company and
>> then
>> give it to the highest bidder
>>
>> no need for votes, 75% or 28 days or anything!
>>
>> Job done.
>>
>> Stotty
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Mark Humphries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> To: "'John Boocock'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'LEEDS LIST'"
>> <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2007 3:16 PM
>> Subject: Re: [LU] Rumours
>>
>>
>> > Wont we be back at square one though - as the problem the time before
>> was
>> > the vote allocation.  Unless HMRC tell the bidders that they will
>> > accept/vote for any bid > 7% (or whatever).
>> >
>> > That still wont help Redbus if Astor stick by their line to only vote
>> for
>> > Bates as they wont ever be able to get 75% will they?
>> >
>> >> -----Original Message-----
>> >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:leedslist-
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Boocock
>> >> Sent: 04 July 2007 14:36
>> >> To: LEEDS LIST
>> >> Subject: [LU] Rumours
>> >>
>> >> There's a rumour going round that KPMG have got the CVA set aside
>> and
>> >> that there will be a bidding process, only a rumour mind
>> >> you.............
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list
>> >> administrators accept no liability for the personal views and
>> opinions
>> >> of contributors.
>> >> Leedslist mailing list
>> >> [email protected]
>> >> http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
>> >> Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list
>> administrators
>> > accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of
>> contributors.
>> > Leedslist mailing list
>> > [email protected]
>> > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
>> > Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
> accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
> Leedslist mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
> 



_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. 
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org 

Reply via email to