"It" being HMRC's motivation. "The Inland Revenue put a caveat on that CVA that Boston could not pay football creditors." http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/b/boston_united/6738469.stm
Plus they hate Bates... it's a win win. And his dodgy dealings gave them a opening for a challenge when they failed to affect the CVA. - Si Nigel Holcroft wrote: > Depending what "it" is, then yes most things are open to interpretation or > can have, genuinely dual motivation... I don't recall HMRC announcing that > as being the reason rather than a consequence but pettiness and spite loom > large in many situations.. Time and a court case may tell us morel.. > > -----Original Message----- > From: On Behalf Of Simon Austin > Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 2:41 PM > Subject: Re: [LU] Bates' letter > > Er... can't it be both? HMRC spiked Boston's CVA so they couldn't pay > all their football debts... > _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
