Jim The problem would have been (might yet be) if not all advance applications were successfully processed before the ST and members buy another three each, particularly if the advance applicants were left with only the most expensive tickets.
Likewise, the advance applicants (both ST and members) seem to have received less regard to their seating preference (expressed many days prior) than that afforded to personal purchasers at the TO. The declared intention to close the TO last Friday appeared to be the time when advance applications would be processed, which would have been rather a good idea IMO. I also think that the Purchase Confirmation messages now being sent out should give seat allocation details and price paid, as a minimum. Dunderhead > -----Original Message----- > From: Jim Moran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 May 2008 18:06 > To: dunderhead; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [LU] Tickets - when is a queue not a queue? > > Why? > > Every ST holder and member is guaranteed ONE ticket, so why does it > matter > *when* it's processed? 3 of us (ST holders) put in an application > together > on Tuesday, and got confirmation this morning, so I suppose it was > worth > using the advance option. We're all guaranteed a ticket, and we all > got > one. Not sure what else you want the Ticket Office to do!? > > -------------------------------------------------- > From: "dunderhead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > So getting in the online queue early was a complete waste of time. > _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist "the morphine patch and the handfuls of dihydrocodiene and paracetamol did the business. I am GOING TO WEMBLEY !!!!" Dave Nattan May 16th 2008
