Australian Financial Review
http://www.afr.com.au/content/990310/news/news10.html
Mar 10, 1999

Taylorism in an IT world

Work Relations, 
By Stephen Long 

Frederick Winslow Taylor has a lot to answer for. The man who destroyed the
working lives of countless millions by stripping their jobs of autonomy and
skill is now being blamed for the failure of modern firms to adapt to the
needs of the knowledge economy.

According to a report by The Economist Intelligence Unit and Andersen
Consulting, companies are risking extinction by stifling the innovation and
creativity of high-skill "knowledge workers".

It argues that the IT revolution has transformed the nature of work, making
knowledge a primary commodity and creating a new breed of high-skill
workers who need, and demand, autonomy.

Knowledge workers' key attribute is their ability to handle complexity and
uncertainty - hallmarks of the age. Yet managers continue to impose a
command and control approach, based on the belief that "there is a single
best and right way to do anything in order to achieve a standard result".
This, the report argues, "is a direct holdover from ... Taylor's principles
of scientific management".

I do not dispute that Tayloristic management still prevails in many
organisations, nor that it places a dead hand on innovation and creativity.
(Though it should be noted that high-skilled "knowledge workers" are less
subject to this low-trust, control approach than most employees). But is
the knowledge workers' struggle to maintain autonomy and discretion over
work really something new, or part of an age-old battle between skilled
workers and managements keen to maximise labour application?

Taylor, readers familiar with labour history may recall, pioneered the late
nineteenth century school of "scientific management" which provided the
bedrock for management thinking and work design throughout this century.

The scion of a well-to-do Philadelphia family, he turned his back on
Harvard and a career in law to train as a craft apprentice, before taking a
job as a labourer in a steelworks. Armed with this  experience, Taylor was
able to serve his class far better than he could have as a graduate of
Harvard Law.

Like today's "knowledge workers", fin de siecle craftsmen were masters of a
body of specialist knowledge which they applied with autonomy and
discretion. Management assumed that each worker was more skilled in his or
her own trade than anyone in management could be, so the details of how the
work was best done were left to the worker.

Taylor set about to change all that. His principles were that management
"gather all of the traditional knowledge possessed by workmen and reduce it
to rules, laws and formulae" ... "that all possible brain work should be
removed from the shop" ... "and that management plan and specify each task
... not only what is to be done, but how ... and the exact time allowed for
doing it".

In short, that management secure a monopoly over knowledge to control each
step of the labour process in order to maximise efficiency. This was the
modus operandi of the mass production assembly line. And the logic of
Taylorism, together with its ruthless drive for efficiency, still permeate
organisations today.

It might be harder for managers to appropriate the knowledge of employees
whose key skill is abstract thinking. But it's a safe bet they will try.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]



*************************************************************************
This posting is provided to the individual members of this  group without
permission from the copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment,
scholarship and research under the "fair use" provisions of the Federal
copyright laws and it may not be distributed further without permission of
the copyright owner, except for "fair use."




--

          Leftlink - Australia's Broad Left Mailing List
                           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://www.alexia.net.au/~www/mhutton/index.html
   
Sponsored by Melbourne's New International Bookshop
Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=subscribe%20leftlink
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20leftlink

Reply via email to