-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Zeltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Monday, 8 March 1999 23:20
Subject: Labor On Line Hitting Home



NY Labor On Line Hits A Chord
by Steve Zeltzer
February 15, 1999


The first labor telecommunication conference on the East Coast that 
brought together labor computer, video and radio activists was an 
unequivocal success.  

The conference (www.laboronline.org) which was held on Jan 15 & 16 at 
the Brooklyn College Graduate Center For Workers was sponsored by not 
only a large number of New York area unions but by the Union 
Producers and Programmers Network(UPPNET), LaborNet-IGC and the 
Brooklyn College Center for Workers.  

Many unionists who do similar work came together for the first time. 
There was a recognition for not only for most of the participants but 
speakers from the NY Central Labor Council that labor has to get on 
board the technology movement.  

One of the first panels was on the use of web pages by various 
Internationals in the AFL-CIO. Web masters from UNITE, CWA, UAW, SEIU 
and AFSCME discussed how they put material on their pages and the 
responses. It was clear from their structure that these are tightly 
controlled either by lawyers having to approve everything that is put 
on the pages or a very bureaucratic structure that limits the 
liveliness of these pages. 

There was also a question from the Korean representative of Labor 
News Production and Korean LaborNet about the interactive use of 
their web pages for communication and democracy. All the participants 
said that this either would not be allowed or that th ere was no 
plans to make the sites interactive for the entire membership. Some 
unions did report that they are developing mailing lists but these 
were limited to only some officials. 

One participant from England, Chris Bailey also raised the question 
of the lack of material on the general strike against the 
privatization of the telephone company in Puerto Rico. He questioned 
why there was no information on the home page of the CWA de spite the 
fact that this strike was also aimed at the non-union telecom company 
Sprint. Again the explanation was that it was somewhere else on the 
site. Another issue was the use of these web sites for all workers 
including Spanish speaking workers. 

The UNITE web master said that the pages were mostly used for 
clothing champaigns and all the pages were in English. This obviously 
limited the web pages for all those Spanish speaking members of 
UNITE. Many of the most popular workshops were on the "How To Setup" 
web sites, mailing lists and use the internet for research. While the 
AFL-CIO National Communication Director Bill Mountjoy, had been 
invited months earlier a day before the conference was to be held he 
called and said he could not participate because the AFL-CIO was not 
yet ready to announce their "new" inter net strategy. This he said 
was a business driven plan to sell union made products on the net 
similar to E-Com. 

Despite the failure of the AFL-CIO to "officially" participate, 
Denise Mitchel did send a representative of the New York office of 
Abernathy and Anderson to attend and take notes. Mitchel who is 
director of Public Relations of the AFL-CIO uses the non-union 
Abernathy and Anderson advertising firm to do a large amount of 
public relations and "organizing" for the AFL-CIO.  

Michael Paluszek of the New York office attend the labor cable 
workshop as well as other sessions and took extensive notes for 
Mitchell. His card of course had no union bug but this might have 
been because of their other "corporate work".  

The market driven direction of the national AFL-CIO in relationship 
to the media and communications of the AFL-CIO has also led to 
grievances at their national office. John Sweeney and Mitchel have 
contracted out entire sections of the AFL-CIO work including much of 
the computer work to Abernathy and Anderson as well as other firms. 
In fact the Newspaper Guild which represents staffers has filed 
grievances against this practice.  

It led to the situation that at the last AFL-CIO convention, 
resolutions and press statements were unavailable on their web page 
because they had to be gotten through the Abernathy and Anderson 
public relations firm. Roy Abernathy by the way is the husba nd of 
Denise Mitchell.  

The funding of television commercials by the AFL-CIO is also in most 
cases funnelled through this firm and a number of other 
internationals including the SEIU have used Abernathy & Anderson non-
union staffers to do organizing and public relations work. One 
contentious issue was the failure of the AFL-CIO to develop an 
independent labor cable channel and to support local labor media on 
community access and radio with proper funding.  

While the AFL-CIO recently announced it will be spending $40 million 
on the upcoming election cycle, none of this money is scheduled to be 
spent on local and regional labor media run by unions and other labor 
activists.  

The conference was also held at the same time as the lock-out of the 
NABET-CWA technicians. A delegation of 4 came to the conference to 
learn about how they could further development of this technology on 
their struggle. They had developed web pages for their locals, but 
the national CWA web page had not been updated on their struggle 
since August according to one member of New York NABET Local 16.  

Many CWA members around the country were not even aware that their 
sister CWA-NABET-ABC workers were locked out of their jobs. The media 
blockade by the corporate media machines was discussed at the 
conference extensively. While the conference itself was covered by 
the Village Voice, it was ignored by most of the rest of the 
capitalist press.  

One of the most interesting panels was on the organizing of workers 
in new communication technology. A discussion developed on whether 
web workers and others could be organized and Michael Blain from the 
CWA supported WashTech reported on the work to or ganize contract 
workers. Also Ken Hamidi of www.faceintel.org reported on the 
struggle to defend the right to communicate by workers at Intel 
corporation and the importance for labor in defending democracy on 
the internet.  

Ken Hamidi had been fired by Intel after becoming disabled and began 
to fight back by forming a committee called Former and Current 
Employees of Intel. He had also sent out thousands of email messages 
to Intel workers through the internet and was being sued by Intel for 
invasion of privacy. Hamidi reported on the contradiction of Intel 
and the US government that call for freedom of the internet in China 
but refuse to support it here.  

It was clear that most of labor is totally unaware of how these 
attack on free speech on the net will impinge on their own right to 
organize. Jonathan Tasini, president of the the National Writers 
Union-UAW supported the need for labor to become more involved in 
these issues. There were also participants from the AFL-CIO research 
department who were seeking to get more information to develop a 
public policy for the AFL-CIO.  

On Friday night, a well attended labor film and video festival was 
held and videos from around the world were also presented. These 
videos were from Mexico, Korea, Japan, Australia and an international 
labor video made by UPPNET on the International Day of Action for the 
Liverpool Dockers.One of the most powerful videos was "The Crisis Of 
Capital, The Hope Of Labor" by Korean Labor News Production in Seoul 
(www.lnp.org). This video which was shot by workers themselves was 
edited on digital equipment and included not only fine editing but 
music from labor rap singers and musicians.  

The international labor communication panel on Saturday brought 
together labor communication activists from the UK, Korea and India. 
Eric Lee of Labourstart in London lamented that the trade union 
movement has not moved as fast as he hoped to develop labor 
communication for solidarity and democracy.  

One controversy arose when he attacked the new leader of the 
Teamsters Jimmy Hoffa Jr.. One participant complained that this was 
uncalled for since Hoffa as well had used email lists to organize 
support in the election campaign. She also said she wanted to see all 
information from all viewpoints and make her own choice.  

One of the most significant developments was the discussion about the 
need for a Labor Technolgy Magazine on line. One of participants from 
the American Airlines Allied Pilots union reported on how the company 
was now seeking to control the pilots by get ting them to use the AA 
email system rather than the union system. This was crucial for 
dispatch and vacation requests. If the union system was used it would 
defend worker's rights while if the pilots were locked into 
management's system it could be used to victimize them.  

The issue of spying on workers and retaliation of workers because of 
the use of the internet was also raised by a participant from the 
IAM. More and more workers according to her were being fired and 
threatened by their use of company email by airline ma nagement. The 
need for the entire labor movement to become aware of these 
developments was obvious to all the participants and plans were 
discussed about launching the on line journal that could address 
these many questions. Discussions also took place about an 
international conference on the right to communicate in London 
possibly in June 1999 that Chris Bailey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and 
Labor/Labournets APC will be organizing as well as a LaborMedia 
conference that will be h eld in early November 99 in Seoul, Korea.  

The sentiment of the participants was that there is a pressing need 
to support all these endeavors within the world labor movement and to 
certainly push the AFL-CIO to play a pro-active role in developing 
and using these technologies for all of labor. 

          Leftlink - Australia's Broad Left Mailing List
                           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://www.alexia.net.au/~www/mhutton/index.html

Sponsored by Melbourne's New International Bookshop
Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=subscribe%20leftlink
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20leftlink

Reply via email to