http://www.theaustralian.com.au/index.asp?URL=/national/4263216.htm


  By SID MARRIS

  22mar99

THE Federal Government has hired a research company to uncover 
evidence of employers colluding with unions to maintain high levels 
of  union membership.  

However, the ACTU has condemned the survey as biased and says it is 
designed to select the Government's next target for confrontation 
after the failure of its attack on wharfies.  

The survey, commissioned by the Office of the Employment Advocate, is 
seeking about 1000 employers to explain why their companies have high 
rates of union membership.  

Suggested answers in the 28-question survey for explaining high 
unionisation levels range from a "better the devil you know" approach 
to concern about possible industrial disruption if the employers did 
not comply. Other options include industry association 
recommendations or demands from customers or clients that workers be 
unionised.  

Some questions give the option that employees choose to be union 
members.  

The written survey is to be backed up by a telephone poll of 
employees, asking their attitudes to union membership and unions.  

The Employment Advocate has responsibility for the freedom of 
association provisions of the Workplace Relations Act.  

Advocate Jonathan Hamberger said the survey was designed to help his 
office plan priorities and establish whether there were still 
problems  with compulsory unionism.  

"It would be naive of anyone to suggest that because an Act of 
parliament is passed that there is no longer compulsory unionism," he 
said. "From our point of view, this is a scientific survey because we 
want to find this information out.  

"There is no way we are assuming workers are only in unions because 
they are forced to."  

ACTU assistant secretary Greg Combet said the survey was another sign 
of the deteriorating industrial environment being fostered by 
Workplace Relations Minister Peter Reith, despite research by his 
party's pollsters showing voters were wary of government taking a 
biased role.  

"I think the second-term agenda for Reith is to beat up business on a 
range of fronts to undermine unionism in the workplace," Mr Combet 
said.  

"We know, because employers report to us Mr Reith is very aggressive 
to encourage them to take a similarly aggressive stance against the 
unions."  

Mr Combet warned employers the survey might be a trap, but Mr 
Hamberger said he was using a research company, Wallis Consulting, to 
ensure confidentiality.  

Unions believe the OEA is preparing a major assault on Victorian 
building sites. Mr Reith has singled out Victorian employers for co-
operating with the unions.  

[This posting is provided to the individual members of this  group without
permission from the copyright owner for purposes  of criticism, comment,
scholarship and research under the "fair use" provisions of the Federal
copyright laws and it may not be distributed further without permission of
the copyright owner, except for "fair use."]



          Leftlink - Australia's Broad Left Mailing List
                           mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        http://www.alexia.net.au/~www/mhutton/index.html

Sponsored by Melbourne's New International Bookshop
Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=subscribe%20leftlink
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20leftlink

Reply via email to