Globe
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2000 13:45:15 -0800
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Loop: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Precedence: bulk

The Boston Globe 1/23/2000

UNIONS FLEX NEW MUSCLE AS OVERSEAS TIES GROW

By Diane E. Lewis

After Sam Weinstein learned of a pending merger between New England 
Electric System in Westborough and a British company, the 51-year-old union 
representative was eager to meet with his counterparts overseas.

Weinstein, a senior aide at the 50,000-member Utility Workers Union of 
America, was seeking a three-year contract with NEES that would be binding 
even after the utility merged with National Grid Inc. of London. Two other 
unions had similar concerns. NEES assured the unions there would be no 
layoffs, but Weinstein's union wanted to organize all subsidiaries and new 
acquisitions worldwide, without corporate interference. The company balked. 
Why give the union carte blanche?

But with support from four British unions, US utility workers secured a 
contract with NEES that gave them the right to use card checks to organize 
customer service, technical, and field workers in the United States. And 
the company said it would remain neutral.

Welcome to the new world of union muscle.

With the boom in corporate mergers and global operations, US unions - many 
of them at utility and telecommunications companies - are joining with 
their counterparts at home and abroad to build the size and strength they 
need to take on these new, larger corporations. "Two things are happening," 
said Nelson Lichtenstein, a professor of history at the University of 
Virginia and author of "Walter Reuther: The Most Dangerous Man in Detroit."

"First, the interconnections in telecommunications are so intimate and 
far-reaching that the utility and telephone unions have had to try and 
reinvent themselves, because everything is changing so rapidly. "They are 
finding that they are going to have to become international, and they must 
connect with other European unions. "Secondly," he said, "the labor 
movement is reaching out to workers and labor groups in underdeveloped 
countries in new ways, and this - as we saw with the World Trade 
Organization demonstrations in Seattle - has become a real political issue."

To be sure, European and North American unions are not strangers to one 
another. In the late 1800s, a coalition of trade unions brought labor 
leaders on both continents together for the first time. And US steel and 
auto unions have longstanding relationships with labor abroad. "There is no 
question that union cooperation is increasing, and it is increasing out of 
necessity," said Kenneth Zinn, North American director of the International 
Federation of Chemical, Energy, Mine and General Workers' Unions, an 
international coalition of 450 labor groups. Zinn acknowledged, however, 
that with a few notable exceptions, labor's desire for more international 
cooperation has not led to many cross-border agreements. Nevertheless, 
changes are afoot: Last week, US workers at Imerys, a multinational 
ceramics and construction materials corporation headquartered in Paris, 
joined with Belgian unions and ICEM to launch an international organizing 
campaign at the company's subsidiaries. In the United States, the Paper, 
Allied-Industrial, Chemical and Energy Workers union is trying to organize 
Imerys's plants in Georgia and Alabama.

Last May in California, in a move that clearly suggested greater 
cooperation with foreign unions, the 22,000-member Service Employees 
International Union, Local 1877, formalized a partnership with Mexico's 
Telephone Workers Union. Both unions represent janitors and other service 
employees.

In 1999, the Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers signed a three-year pact with 
DSM Polymer in Virginia after the company's Netherlands parent, DSM, 
declined to bargain. DSM changed its mind after the workers contacted the 
Dutch union, FNV Bondgenoten. Together, the labor groups persuaded the 
company to negotiate.

Two years ago, the ICEM convened a meeting in Washington, with the leaders 
of 350,000 utility union workers from Britain and the United States. The 
goal: to explore new ways to collaborate. British unionists discussed 
privatization in the electric utility industry and its impact on job 
security and future bargaining. During the race to privatize, they said, 
several British electric companies had been purchased by US firms. For US 
labor leaders, the central concern was deregulation's impact on union 
workers and organizing.

The ICEM has since developed a Web site, www.icem.org, which lists a 
network of unions at multinational corporations and provides union news 
from around the world.

Weinstein, of the US utility union, believes that securing the help of the 
British unions helped allay layoff fears among New England Electric 
System's rank and file. "The meetings with the British unions were 
critical," he said. "They took our side, and that had a huge impact. It 
made it clear that the company would get no agreements from any of its 
unions [during the merger] unless the unions got something, too."

The story doesn't end there.

"Last September, after British trade union leaders asked NEES and National 
Grid to consider forming an international joint labor-management council, 
we met again," said Bill Dowd, chief labor spokesman for NEES. "We rapidly 
reached agreement on how the council will work."  According to Dowd, 
National Grid, which had a longstanding relationship with unions, was 
instrumental in getting the US unions, NEES, and National Grid's executives 
together. At Narragansett Electric in Providence, a NEES subsidiary, 
technician Laurie Stenovitch wasn't sure what to expect. "When I heard we 
would be under new, British ownership, I was a little nervous," she said.

"I thought, `What are they going to do with us?' Now I honestly don't think 
there will be layoffs, because we are too understaffed." Stenovitch, with 
the company 13 years, said she was heartened by the fact National Grid 
regularly negotiates with unions and by the meetings between the British 
and US utility and electrical unions. "That will keep us all on the same 
page," she said.

Even so, future efforts won't mean much unless the US labor movement is 
able to hammer out cross-border agreements, such as the 1998 pact between 
ICEM unions and Statoil, a Norwegian corporation. Statoil agreed it and its 
22 subsidiaries would respect the rights of workers to organize. The 
company also said it would maintain occupational safety and environmental 
standards. For the most part, however, unions are still struggling to hold 
the line on declining membership and have been slow to respond to economic 
shifts. And they have had difficulty overcoming national and geographic 
barriers - factors that could hurt their attempts to extend and strengthen 
international ties.

"For a long time, the cold war was being played out among labor unions here 
and abroad," said Kate Bronfenbrenner, director of labor education and 
research at Cornell University. "Then, the realization emerged that 
multinationals could be vulnerable, but only if unions found the right 
leverage point. Many unions are now beginning to see that that leverage 
point is collaboration."

Faced with the furious pace of mergers, consolidations, and restructurings 
in the telecommunications industry, the Communications Workers of America 
began reaching out to foreign labor leaders in the 1980s. In recent years, 
it has developed ties with the Mexican Telephone Workers union, the 
Communications Workers Union in Britain, and with labor groups worldwide 
with links to such companies as Nortel and Ameritech.

Steve Early, a CWA representative in Boston, said there will be more 
international union partnerships in the future. But the strength of those 
collaborations, he said, will depend largely on US labor's ability to 
organize workers on the grass-roots level in a "worker-to-worker, 
action-oriented effort.

"Progress is being made, but too often it is too little, too late," he 
said. "US unions are still taking baby steps, but the consciousness within 
the labor movement is changing. Labor now understands that nowadays, you 
cannot win a union battle without international cooperation or cross-border 
bargaining."




--

           Leftlink - Australia's Broad Left Mailing List
                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
         http://www.alexia.net.au/~www/mhutton/index.html

Sponsored by Melbourne's New International Bookshop
Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=subscribe%20leftlink
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20leftlink

Reply via email to