The legacy of Eureka
Interview with Peter Lalor

The following article was published in "The Guardian", newspaper
of the Communist Party of Australia in its issue of Wednesday,
May 3rd, 2000. Contact address: 65 Campbell Street, Surry Hills.
Sydney. 2010 Australia. Phone: (612) 9212 6855 Fax: (612) 9281 5795.
CPA Central Committee: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"The Guardian": <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Webpage: http://www.cpa.org.au>
Subscription rates on request.
******************************


To mark May Day 2000 "The Guardian"'s Marcus Browning talked to
Peter Lalor, the leader of the 1854 armed insurrection by miners
at the Eureka Stockade in Ballarat, about the uprising and
its legacy and how he perceives changes in Australia since.

The short, broad-shouldered Irishman sat erect on the edge of his
chair, the mark of a musket powder burn on his forehead and the
stump of his arm at his side. Marcus asked him to discuss his
specific role in the rebellion.

PL: I don't want to talk about my part in it alone or above the
others. It was a mighty act of defiance by us all.

MB: Perhaps you could begin by giving us a picture of the
developments leading up to the construction of the stockade and
the insurrection.

PL: Well, as you might know, the Victorian Government had imposed
a 30 shillings a month licence fee on us miners who were digging
the goldfields at Ballarat. This was so they could wield more
control over us and eventually force us off the goldfields and
back to giving our labour to the colonial employing class for a
bloody pittance.

In order to extract the licence money they put together a special
force of armed police, not a few of them ex-convicts. This force
used what were called "digger hunts", where they would raid a
section of the diggings and demand to see every digger's licence.

Those who could not produce them on the spot were taken into
custody, sometimes being chained to logs or trees until the hunt
was over and they could be taken before a magistrate.

The penalty for failing to produce the licence was five pounds, a
big sum of money for us miners whose only possessions were our
pick and shovel and tin dish and the clothes on our backs.

MB: Many historians claim that in fact you weren't strictly
workers at all, but men seeking individually to enrich
yourselves, to "be your own boss".

PL: Well, hindsight is a fine thing, as they say, and I'm in a
position to have more than my share of it. It's true that we
weren't wage earners, but many of us were from the working class
nonetheless.

The emergence of the the big mining companies soon put an end to
our working independently for ourselves and turned us into wage
slaves.

That now is part of the history of capitalism. Marx himself,
though he was far away in Europe, saw the significance of the
events at Eureka (of course we didn't have Marx or Lenin or
Engels to refer to at the time).

Marx could see that in demanding the abolition of a direct tax on
labour and the abolition of property qualifications to vote or be
members of parliament, the diggers were actually fighting for the
same things which led to the declaration of independence of the
United States of America.

There was a difference, however, that he noted, and it was --
I'll quote the man -- "that in Australia the opposition against
the monopolists united with the colonial bureaucrats, arises from
the workers".

We weren't conscious of that, you understand. Our struggle was
sparked by an economic need and as it developed our main
political aim became the ending of the power of the unelected
royalty and their underlings.

MB: So you had no voting rights?

PL: No. The franchise was based on property qualifications and
most miners had no property.

MB: Where did things go to next?

PL: All this didn't happen overnight. It was a long campaign
where we put forward a number of demands, including the basic
Chartist demands for electoral reform. But it was to no avail.

Things really came to a head when digger James Scobie was
murdered near the Eureka Hotel in Ballarat by the publican, an
ex-convict who was friendly with the police. There was no
stopping things then. There was a fury among the diggers and they
stormed the pub and burned it to the ground.

That's when we formed the Ballarat Reform League and set down our
demands.

On November 29, 1854, thousands of us Ballarat diggers met and
burned their licences. A savage diggers hunt began. About a 1,000
of us marched to Bakery Hill, in the Eureka district, and built
the stockade.

MB: What was the background of the agitators? Were they
experienced in politics?

PL: There were a lot of people who came to the diggings, hundreds
of thousands. Among them were French socialists, German
republicans, English Chartists and Irish rebels. Altogether a
small group in comparison; still we had a strong influence.

MB: How did it compare to other uprisings in the colony?

PL: It was the first major uprising against British rule in the
history of the colony. There was a mutiny in 1804 by Irish
convicts at Castle Hill, near Parramatta, that was brutally put
down and the convicts hanged on the spot.

MB: How was the attack on the stockade carried out?

PL: Early on the morning of December 3 they launched their attack
on us when our numbers were down. They outnumbered us two to one.
It was a bloody and ruthless attack and we fought back with all
our might but they overwhelmed us. Some estimates put the deaths
at more than 30.

We killed five soldiers and an officer. Some of us, including
myself, escaped. Others were captured and charged with treason
and sedition.

MB: Looking back, what do you see the rebellion having achieved
in the history of Australia?

PL: In the short term we made certain gains. The ordinary folk in
the colony were sympathetic to our cause and supported many of
our demands. Those charged were either acquitted or had their
charges dropped. When myself and others came out of hiding there
were no charges put against us.

The following year, 1855, the miners' licence was put in the
dustbin and a new document called the Miner's Right was
introduced, costing only one pound a year and containing the
right to vote.

Two years later manhood suffrage was granted for the election of
the Legislative Assembly.

MB: And the long term?

PL: While we were not a class in our right, our organisation and
actions were an example for the development of the Australian
working class.

Our uprising in many ways was spontaneous but it nonetheless
showed the necessity of having a force that is conscious of the
need to act in their own class interests.

You know, understanding that -- understanding the need for
collective action -- is the basis of the organised working class.

The trade union movement in Victoria was just emerging at the
time of the stockade and those class conscious workers rallied
around the miners.

Their first victories for the eight-hour work day were achieved
in 1856.

MB: And what of its political influence?

PL: I think the uprising's most valuable political lesson was
that it revealed the nature of the state. We defied the state and
brandished our fists and our collective power at it. The ruling
class, then as now, will tolerate no such actions.

The state, as Lenin said, is "a machine for keeping the rule of
one class over another" and you can see at a glance that this is
true in the great and proud history of struggle of Australia's
working class.

It was there in the strikes of the 1890s, when the ruling classes
tried to push the economic burden of the '90s depression onto the
toilers.

You'll recall there was the maritime strike because of the attack
by the Steamship Owners Association on steamship officers who had
the audacity to form a union and affiliate themselves with the
Trades Hall Council.

Combined with the struggle by the wharf labourers it was nothing
less than an attack on the right of workers to organise in a
union.

There was the great shearers' strike at Barcaldine, the miners'
strike in Broken Hill, both in '92. The members of the Industrial
Workers' of the World who were framed and jailed during WW1, the
police protection of scabs and strike breakers in the 1917
general strike.

There were the attacks on and arrests of striking timber workers
in 1929 and the shooting down of coal miners at Rothbury that
same year.

The police bashings and eviction of impoverished tenants during
the Great Depression, the state acceptance and protection of the
fascist New Guard in the 1930s, the use of troops by the Labor
Government to break the coal strike of 1949 ... the list is
endless.

To this day it continues -- the collusion between government and
employer in the attack on the Maritime Union, the struggle by the
mine workers against the likes of BHP and Rio Tinto's attempts to
wipe out trade unionism.

MB: It does give the lie to much of the history written of
Australia as an essentially classless society mostly free of
conflict, doesn't it?

PL: Yes. There's always the military and police and the law
courts brought into the fray. But you know, its a wonderful
fighting tradition we have here, a tradition that shows the
unstoppable optimism of we ordinary working people, no matter how
dark the day may seem at times.

We can marvel at the resilience and strength of people, and look
back to 1854 from this May Day in the year 2000 and see how far
we've come and perhaps know better the road ahead.






--

           Leftlink - Australia's Broad Left Mailing List
                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
         http://www.alexia.net.au/~www/mhutton/index.html

Sponsored by Melbourne's New International Bookshop
Subscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=subscribe%20leftlink
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Body=unsubscribe%20leftlink


Reply via email to