I have gone the other way (splitting one master source into multiple), and it was a *lot* of work.
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Janis L Gilmore <rajan...@earthlink.net> wrote: > In theory, it seems as if that would be true. But I haven't done much > combining of sources, so I can't speak with any authority. <g> > > Janis > > > On 10/5/09 4:21 PM, "Bruce Jones" <juicebo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> It seems to me that it is easier for a Splitter to move toward being a >> Lumper (by combining Master Sources) than it is for a Lumper to move >> towards being a Splitter. Do you agree? >> >> On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:25 AM, Janis L Gilmore <rajan...@earthlink.net> >> wrote: > > > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
