Abdul, I would say that is a very sensible approach! Have one primary tree which you know is proven and separate trees for those not proven. When you have established a proven link with another tree, primary or not, merge those trees.
Norm Spain 2009/12/25 Abdul Haqq <[email protected]> > Hi, > I have started on my tree for about the last week and already it is > getting cumbersome. Many entries are not confirmed so I see it as a sketch. > Is it good practice or not to break down the tree into several separate > trees and then merge them only when information is confirmed. Can the > result in any problems? > > -- Regards Norman Weston Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
