Rich, You've got the right idea but not a good example for a source writer source since you can't edit the year. You could, however, edit your example to CA Los Angeles 1880 census. Since you mention templates though, shouldn't your master source end at the county level? Chicago, then would be the first item of the source citation.
-- Richard Van Wasshnova http://www.gencircles.com/users/vanwasshnova http://gw.geneanet.org/vanwasshnova On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 9:27 AM, RICHARD SCHULTHIES <fourpa...@verizon.net> wrote: > No. It makes nearly identical Sources. For example If my source is IL Cook > Chicago 1880 census, whith all the fields filled in, then I change the name > and stuff to IL Cook Chicago 1900 census, (and attach a person to each) I now > have a 'template' for the Chicago census, or if I have a different place, or > different date, change a few words and you have similarly worded sources, > Making them sort themselves out in an organized manner. > Rich in LA CA > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Mike Fry <mike...@iafrica.com> > To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > Sent: Thu, December 24, 2009 12:25:54 PM > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Changing sources > > William H. Boswell said the following on 2009/12/24 20:48: > >> Whenever I changed anything in a source I get a prompt to update it for >> everyone or just that person. I don't understand what this "secondary >> source" is. Would this be a citation attached to a main source? > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp