I have done it many times. In the example, starting with 1880, which in the 
original source has the date of the 1880, which was '1 Jun 1880 1 month', and 
changed it to 1900, which was ' 1 Jun 1900 1 month'. What I didn't mention, is 
I used the Basic Source, not the Source Writer,  as the wording of the 
question, referred to the tool as 'make new for this person' or 'change for 
everyone' choice; and that works the same in both styles. The important answer 
is that, yes, you must attach a 'new'  source to someone, or the 
not-attached source will disappear.
">> Whenever I changed anything in a source I get a prompt to update it for
>> everyone or just that person.  I don't understand what this "secondary
>> source" is.  Would this be a citation attached to a main source? "
Rich in LA CA


----- Original Message ----
From: Richard Van Wasshnova <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, December 25, 2009 11:26:53 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Changing sources

Rich,

You've got the right idea but not a good example for a source writer
source since you can't edit the year. You could, however, edit your
example to CA Los Angeles 1880 census. Since you mention templates
though, shouldn't your master source end at the county level? Chicago,
then would be the first item of the source citation.

--
Richard Van Wasshnova
http://www.gencircles.com/users/vanwasshnova
http://gw.geneanet.org/vanwasshnova

On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 9:27 AM, RICHARD SCHULTHIES
<[email protected]> wrote:
> No. It makes nearly identical Sources. For example If my source is IL Cook 
> Chicago 1880 census, whith all the fields filled in, then I change the name 
> and stuff to IL Cook Chicago 1900 census, (and attach a person to each) I now 
> have a 'template' for the Chicago census, or if I have a  different place, or 
> different date, change a few words and you have similarly worded sources, 
> Making them sort themselves out in an organized manner.
> Rich in LA CA
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Mike Fry <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thu, December 24, 2009 12:25:54 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Changing sources
>
> William H. Boswell said the following on 2009/12/24 20:48:
>
>> Whenever I changed anything in a source I get a prompt to update it for
>> everyone or just that person.  I don't understand what this "secondary
>> source" is.  Would this be a citation attached to a main source?
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:

  http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to