Jenny M Benson wrote: > The two > things I do have a > problem with is that it some of the citations automatically > assume that > the Report was supplied by the Compiler and then put *my* > residence so > it reads as if that is the Compiler's residence.
Jenny, As you know, SourceWriter templates are based upon examples in the book Evidence Explained. I am away from home this week and don't have a copy of EE with me, but many of the EE examples illustrate complicated situations, e.g. if I'm remembering correctly, the Family Group Sheet template is based upon a collection example, not a single group sheet I received years ago from another researcher (my most common situation). The Family Group Sheet template makes sense when one closely studies the example in EE on which it is based, but I find it unusable for the reasons you mention. I have used "Artifacts - privately held" in the past to cite a FGS, but in looking more closely at the other templates you mention in your original post, I'm now inclined to think that creative use of the fields in the Research Report template might work better. I can't explain the inconsistent way in which the Comments do or do not print on these templates; personally, I'm inclined to ignore that field and use the Text/Comments tab instead, where I can control the printing. Connie Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
