You source is where you got it, in this case, Ancestry.com. I see nothing wrong with sourcing it exactly as you show it. You would want to include the exact URL and the date you viewed it so that someone else could go there to view it.
I have found that complete URLs are necessary because I tried going back and finding an earlier source of mine and couldn't find it. I only had a partial URL and my searches so far have not worked. So, I now copy the complete URL from the web page and include that. On Sun, Feb 7, 2010 at 5:47 AM, James Cook <[email protected]> wrote: > Source Information: > Ancestry.com. Missouri Marriage Records, 1805-2002 [database on-line]. > Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2007. Original data: > Missouri Marriage Records. Jefferson City, MO, USA: Missouri State > Archives. Microfilm. -- Jim Walton "...probe the past carefully and report it as it was, not as I wish it were" >From Evidence Explained by Elizabeth Shown Mills Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
