-----Original Message-----
From: Ron Ferguson <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, February 22, 2010 12:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Questionable children

Please see below.

Heeren wrote:
> No, not speaking of behavior, I have a family that has seven children,
> born between 1765 & 1784, all well researched.
>
> Another researcher has an eighth child that he shows born abt 1790.

*Caution* Another Researcher. This is, of course, a secondary source and by
itself very unreliable. If this researcher quotes sources it is essential
they are followed up, if not, then extreme caution is advised.

  I
> have some serious reservations since Mom would have been 50 by then,

Not entirely unknown, but very unusual. But 6 years after the birth of the
last??? improbable.

> Dad had three brothers (that I know of) who could have a child that
> age and at least three of Mom & Dad's son would have been old enough
> to father a child at that time.

Not unusual for an illegitimate, or other single parent/orphan grandchild,
to be described as the child of the grand parents to avoid stigmatisation,
and in the UK (at least) people were a little indiscriminate in their
description of relationships.

>
> My question is:  I want to keep track of this child & try to place it
> or reject it for good & sufficient reasons but where is the best
> place in Legacy to keep such a child?  I thought about Mom's notes &
> started to put them there but I have used that for bits about her
> that are interesting everyday things, not events.  Same reasons for
> Mom's research records.


If both Mom & Dad were still arrived I would normally enter the child as
unattached with a note in the Marriage Notes and a similar note in the
child's Notes.

> I've decided to use the To-Do list

This is exactly what the TODos are for!


 but before I do, thought I'd check
> with the group here & see if there was any way to keep a *possible*
> child with her family but very noticeably tracked by color or stars or
> something as not proved and/or doubtful?
>

Sorry, but not that I'm aware of.

Ron Ferguson




Legacy User Group guidel


[The entire original message is not included]



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to