GeoSci wrote >And I have hand converted several - and then changed them back. I will >stick with the BASIC format. MUCH mor euser friendly and (if done >right) can give more than enough information.
To repeat part of what you just said, for emphasis "MUCH more user friendly and (if done right)..." The whole point is that it's almost impossible to do it wrong with SourceWriter. You just put into each field whatever it asks for, press a button and out comes a fully formatted citation and bibliography. With Basic you have to know how to write a citation correctly (if you want it to be of a professional or standard format) and then remember how you did it last time if you want to be consistent. Basic is very easy if you are very experienced or want a very simple citation. If you are an anxius newby who wants to "get it right" then SourceWriter is the easier option. -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
