On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:10:21 -0500, James Cook <[email protected]> wrote:

>Would be worth while
>IMO still.

Maybe for a few people out there like yourself. But that would add
another layer of complexity to Legacy sourcing ... which seems hard
enough for many newbies to grasp. It don't matter to me since I am
content with V6.

I think a better way to attack the problem is enhancing Search & Replace
to be a little smarter about how it does what it does. Maybe give the
user a little more control (and better feedback).

--

Dennis Kowallek (LTools)
http://zippersoftware.com/ltools
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to