Gary,

There is a typo in my last post. The phrase "I would not wish to put my
consideration about that of
the family at that time" should say "....*above* that of the family...."

Sorry about that!

Ron Ferguson
_____________________________________________________

*New* Tutorial: Add Location Pins to Google Earth
http://www.fergys.co.uk
Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
And the Fergusons of N.W. England
____________________________________________________


Ron Ferguson wrote:
> Gary,
>
> I don't think that the point is can it be done, but rather, should it
> be done. In my view it shouldn't; my reasoning being that if one has
> decided to keep the families separate then that is how they should be,
> and that is how they should be presented.
>
> It is possible to have both worlds, as the option is there to have
> multiple parents, and hence have the children treated as if they are
> all from the same family with all birth dates being considered. In my
> files, whilst I have some families formally linked with the step and
> natural kids being treated as though they have the same parents, in
> the main I do not make the link and would not wish to.
>
> In some cases it is clear that the step kids were treated as though
> the new parent was their "real" parent eg. their names have been
> changed, in general this is not true and I would not wish to put my
> consideration about that of the family at that time. Sometimes it
> seems clear that the step kids were never part of the new family,
> they may have left home for example.
>
> To conclude, I believe it should be a conscious decision as to
> whether step kids should be integrated into a family, and not one
> made lightly. I consider that the current system offers this.
>
> Ron Ferguson
> _____________________________________________________
>
> *New* Tutorial: Add Location Pins to Google Earth
> http://www.fergys.co.uk
> Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
> And the Fergusons of N.W. England
> ____________________________________________________
>
>
> Gary Elder wrote:
>> Ron, thanks for your reply.  I did see the earlier post about linking
>> children to both sets of parents.
>>
>> I'm sure there is some underlying reason why linking to both sets of
>> parents is necessary, but it seems to me Legacy be able to list all
>> children in the appropriate birth order without having to manually
>> link them to their step parent.  As they say, it is what it is.
>>
>> Thanks again for your help.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Ron Ferguson
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Gary Elder wrote:
>>>> Is there a setting in which the combination of children and
>>>> step-children are sorted by birth date?
>>>>
>>>> Currently, Legacy shows step-children at the bottom of the children
>>>> listings, even though their birth date precedes those of the other
>>>> children of the current spouse. Doing a Sort in the Children's
>>>> Settings doesn't appear to do the job. Perhaps there is a
>>>> preference setting that I'm missing?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Gary,
>>>
>>> Provided that the Step children are linked to both sets of parents
>>> then all children will sort in date of birth order. If they are only
>>> linked to their natural parents then top children will be those of
>>> the parents in the main panel of Family View.
>>>
>>> How to link to more than one set of parents was described in 3 posts
>>> earlier today.
>>>
>>> Ron Ferguson
>>> _____________________________________________________
>>>
>>> *New* Tutorial: Add Location Pins to Google Earth
>>> http://www.fergys.co.uk
>>> Includes the family tree for Alan J Grimshaw
>>> And the Fergusons of N.W. England
>>> ____________________________________________________




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to