John, Thank you for the tip.
Regards, Tim Rosenlof On 6/29/2010 1:31 AM, John & Elizabeth Pethybridge wrote: > This may be usefull for some& 'suck eggs for others' but I have a case that > a family has taken the * Mothers Maiden Name* for their Children. I wanted > to give them their "Lineage Chart" but it would normally (& in this case > only 2 generations) run up the Father Line. > All I did was reverse the Gender of the "Female in the Line"& produce the > "Lineage Chart" for them back to 1655. > > It works perfectly without any hint of the Gender change as there is no > Gender indicators on a Lineage Chart. > I submit it as a suggestion for others who may wish to detour a "normal" > Lineage Chart up any particular line of choice. > Remember to undo the Gender changes. > Goes very well as a road map with an Ancestor Book Report of the same line. > John Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
