Hi Rich. Yes the citation does exist correctly elsewhere and is attached to six 
people totally unrelated to the person/event where it is appearing erroneously. 
(I'm getting fed-up with using that word). Done without Source Writer. Here's 
what I tried.
- Deleted the source and all citations of it. Ran the FGR on my subject and as 
expected, the erroneous citation is gone.
- Created a new source to replace the deleted one, using different wording -- 
just in case!
- Before applying the new source, I reran the FGR and it was still clean.
- Using Advanced Sourcing, applied the new source to the six people where it 
belongs.
- Again ran the FGR on my subject and sh*t, it's back again, complete with the 
new wording.
- I also tried deleting the event in question and re-entering it, to no avail.
Interestingly, the erroneous citation appears only on the face page of the FGR. 
The correct citation appears on the attached Chronology Report.
Does Legacy Support have any ideas on this admittedly minor, but nonetheless, 
annoying problem?

David
www.ildestino.com


-----Original Message-----
From: RICHARD SCHULTHIES [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: July-10-10 11:10 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Erroneous source citation

A similar thing happened a few years ago. Does this citation exist anywhere 
correctly. If no, try this. To confuse the computer, I created a source that 
matched the wrong one, then combined the two, then deleted the one. It took a 
few tries to match enough that it would combine them. More recent versions of 
Legacy may not be as picky as at the time I did it. It seemed at the time, the 
program could only delete a full citation and not a partial. This was done in 
Basic, not Source Writer. You didn't mention what type.
Rich in LA CA

--- On Sat, 7/10/10, David <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: David <[email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Erroneous source citation
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Saturday, July 10, 2010, 10:19 PM
> Thanks for the suggestions Ron,
> though sad to say, none of them worked.
> This is very strange. The erroneous citation only shows up
> in the Family Group Record and seemingly, just for this one
> individual birth event???
>
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ron Ferguson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: July-10-10 1:15 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Erroneous source citation
>
> David wrote:
> > I am getting an erroneous source citation on a birth
> entry in a
> > Family Group Record.
> > The event in question actually had no source showing
> in the List of
> > Assigned Sources.
> > The erroneous source is attached to a group of people
> completely
> > unrelated to the subject of the Family Group Record.
> > The subject of the Family Group Record does not appear
> in the list
> > for the source.
> > I added a new source to the event, hoping to supplant
> the erroneous
> > one. Now, page one on the FGR still shows the
> erroneous source, but
> > where the birth is noted on the Chronology page, the
> new source
> > appears under a different endnote number!!
> > The erroneous source doesn�t seem to show up in
> other reports
> > containing the same subject/event.
> > Any ideas??
> >
> >
> > David
> > www.ildestino.com
> >
>
> David,
>
> A couple of suggestions for starters.
> 1. In Master Lists>Sources>Options Purge unused
> 2. File>File Maintenance>Check Repair and Clean up
> Master Lists, selecting
> everything to do with Sources.
>
> Ron Ferguson
> _____________________________________________________




Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to