I have to say, I'd never heard the term half-cousin until recently, and that
was in an article by Dick Eastman, entitled "There is No Such Thing as a
Half-Cousin"
http://blog.eogn.com/eastmans_online_genealogy/2010/09/there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-half-cousin.html
)

The important bit from his article states:

Black's Law Dictionary defines first cousins as:

"The children of one's aunt or uncle."

Note that it says "aunt *OR* uncle," not both. All that is required is to
share one aunt or one uncle, not both.
Black's Law Dictionary defines second cousins as:

"Persons who are related to each other by descending from the same
great-grandfather or great-grandmother."

Note that it says "the same great-grandfather *OR* great-grandmother," it
does not say BOTH great-grandparents. Second cousins need to share only one
great-grandparent. If they do share both great-grandparents, the
relationship doesn't change; they are still second cousins.

*Source citation:* you can see an image of the appropriate page from Black's
Law Dictionary at http://blacks.worldfreemansociety.org/2/C/c0293.jpg

 So according to this, Legacy is wrong using half-cousin labels, these
people should be cousins, not half-cousins.


For what it's worth!

Regards,

Dermot.

On 30 October 2010 18:25, Garl Satterthwaite <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ward
>
> You got it. The Relationship Calculator displays both relationships
> correctly, but the Set Relationships tool causes the Half Cousin to appear
> on the Family and Pedigree Pages. This is OK if you have a few, but when you
> get hundreds of relatives labeled as half cousins because the events
> occurred a couple hundred years ago it gets very confusing. It seems the
> direct relationship should take priority over the half relationship. It must
> be a programming problem.
>
> Thanks, Garl
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ward Walker [mailto:[email protected]]
>  Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 8:40 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
>
> Are you referring to the Relationship Calculator? And the new scenario is
> that an uncle of yours marries a half aunt of yours? And they are not half
> siblings of each other? I tested this -- marrying an uncle on my dad's side
> to a half-aunt on my mother's side -- and found exactly what I expected.
> The
> Relationship Calculator shows 2 distinct relationships in the upper panel
> (Common Ancestors). Clicking on either changes what you see in the lower
> panel (Descent from Common Ancestor). The first relationship shows the
> child
> of this marriage as my first cousin. We both descend from our fathers'
> parents. The second relationship shows us as half first cousins. We both
> descend from our mothers' mother (in my case), but that's all -- our
> mothers
> do not have the same father.
>
> Saying the same thing another way: Your uncle's child is your first cousin
> and your half aunt's child is your half first cousin. It is the same child,
> but you are related to it in two ways.
>
>  Ward
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Garl Satterthwaite" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2010 1:03 AM
> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
>
>
> Ward
>
> It is little hard to duplicate, but if my Uncle marries a half Aunt their
> child appears as a half first cousin rather than a first cousin. To me it
> should make no difference who he marries their child should be a first
> cousin.
>
> Garl
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ward Walker [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 2:20 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
>
> Garl,
>
> I'm afraid I don't see the problem. Two half first cousins share one common
> grandparent (instead of two). Their children are then half second cousins.
> They can't be full second cousins, since they only have one common
> great-grandparent.
>
> Robert, such a relationship exists in my family (Scenario Two, below). I
> don't think it is possible as a blood relationship. Legacy will not find
> any
> relationship between these two individuals.
>
> Scenario One:  If A is a half cousin to B, their relationship is through
> one
> of B's parents. But B might have a half cousin, C, through the other
> parent.
> A and C are only connected via the marriage of B's parents. A is a 'half
> cousin to a half cousin' of C.
>
> Scenario Two:  Both of your, say, mother's parents remarried and had more
> kids. So your mother has half-siblings on both sides, unrelated to each
> other (except through the marriage of your grandparents). The children of
> all those half siblings are half cousins to you. Those one one side (say,
> your grandfather's) are half cousins to you, who in turn is a half cousin
> to
> those on the other side (your grandmother's).
>
>   Ward
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Robert E. Carneal" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, October 29, 2010 1:29 PM
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Half Cousins
>
>
> When I enter "halfsies," or "in-laws," or "married-ins," I get pretty
> unsure of myself when I manually try to determine relationships.
> Legacy has a wonderful relationship chart that I use a lot, but not
> really all that helpful when it comes to "step" "half" "in-law" or
> "married-in."  Does anyone have a good cheat sheet defining these
> relationships clearly?
>
> One cousin gave me a relation of "You are a half cousin to half cousin
> of James." huh? There isn't such a relationship, is there?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Robert
>
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Garl Satterthwaite
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > I find when an uncle marries a half cousin the half cousin label is
> passed
> > to the descendents in Legacy. The same is true whenever a any cousin
> > marries a half cousin. This does not seem to be correct.
> >
> >
> >
> > Garl Satterthwaite
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>
>   
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp>
>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> Online technical support: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp>
>
> To unsubscribe: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>
>   
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp>
>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>
>   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>
> Online technical support: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp>
>
> To unsubscribe: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp>
>
>
>
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to