Hi Charles,

> I was considering renumbering some RINs, until this thread came up. Now I am 
> not sure whether to do it or not.

What are your reasons for considering renumbering your RINs?  These
could be important in your decision-making.

If it is, as was mentioned earlier, to give someone close to you in your
family a lower number, I personally would not bother.  The size of the
number is quite irrelevant to the relationship to any other person in
the database.

My partner is number 246 in my database - that is, I entered 245 other
people (including myself, of course) before I added him.  It means
nothing, except that he was the 246th person entered.  We'd been
together for almost 20 years at that time.  My focus was simply
elsewhere for a while.  Coincidentally, it's an easy number for me to
remember, when I want to find him quickly, such as when I'm using the
relationship calculator, but that's accidental - and irrelevant, too.

Instead look at it this way - at that point, I had 246 people in my
database!  That was a big number to me at that stage, and a mark of
achievement.

If we had a child now (that is NOT going to happen!), his/her RIN would
be 10752.  It says nothing about what that child means to me, it's just
a unique number in the file.  Nothing else.

Hope this helps.  :-)

Kind Regards,
Wendy Howard
--
Kaiwaka, Northland, New Zealand
http://freepages.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~wendyh65/
<http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/%7Ewendyh65/>



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to