Thanks Charles.   I appreciate that information.

Jerry - MerriamFamilyTree.org

On 9/18/2011 3:53 PM, Charles Apple wrote:
> Jerry,
>
> I would recommend that you continue making a note of cousin marriages, 
> although some didn't see the point of your question, I definitely do. I 
> suspected that one of my ancestors in particular had married first cousins, 
> and it took me ten (10) long years of research before I was able to prove 
> with empirical evidence that the marriage took place. Many may think that was 
> silly of me and a waste of time, however, the point of proving the marriage 
> was that it connected a line of descendants, from that marriage, to the 
> source ancestor. If it  was not for the proof of that marriage, I would still 
> be guessing at the connection, and their ancestors.
>
> That single connection allowed me to follow the ancestry back to England from 
> which they immigrated. For those that think this is not important, Sir 
> Admiral Nicholas Haddock, and his father Sir Richard Haddock portraits can 
> both be viewed at the National Maritime Museum in Greenwich, London. Both 
> served in the British Royal Navy.
>
> So by all means please make a note. Those that don't may regret it later.
>
> Charles
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerry [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2011 3:09 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Marriage To Cousins
>
> I don't know why you would treat it any differently.  I know why I would.  
> Our 522-page genealogy book happens to mention it whenever it occurs, even 
> though it was common in the 1800s, more so than today.  So, since they 
> mention it, I think I'll continue to put my simple note in the standard 
> marriage event as I've been doing.  I guess the answers confirmed I'm on the 
> right track.
>
> By the way, why is everyone so grumpy on the list when a simple question is 
> asked?  There is a right way to respond and saying "I don't see the
> point of your question?" seems grumpy to me.   Sorry, but it does, but
> maybe I'm being grumpy in responding in kind.
>
> But, thanks - I've got all the information on the subject I need and then 
> some.
>
> Jerry - MerriamFamilyTree.org
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on 
> our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to