That is an interesting thought & I've just tried it with a queried
placename from my tree - and yes, 'Luffield Abbey?'  sorts directly
after 'Luffield Abbey' in the master List of locations.

I quite like the ? at the front of a placename because it emphasises the
uncertainty - but there's mileage in your excellent suggestion.  Many thanks

On 06/10/2011 05:25, Shirley Richardson wrote:
> If you used Towcester? then it would sort after all the Towcesters.
> Would that work OK?
> Shirley
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* Jerry <mailto:[email protected]>
>     *To:* [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>     *Sent:* Thursday, October 06, 2011 11:39 AM
>     *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] Advice on name for 'probable' town
>
>     I like that idea, Joan.
>
>     Joan Kemp <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>      >I use ?Towcester (eg) for a probable, but unproven location. The
>      >problem is that this files as a separate town. Given the vagaries of
>      >genealogy, it would be very useful for the Legacy programmers to
>     come up
>      >with a way of describing a probable location which was filed with its
>      >'parent town' - so that ?Whittlebury & Whittlebury (for example) were
>      >counted as the same location
>      >
>      >Joan
>      >
>      >On 05/10/2011 18:37, Kirsten Bowman wrote:
>      >> I loved the angle bracket solution for probable information and
>     used it
>      >> in a variety of fields until I saw that, with GEDCOMs posted at
>      >> RootsWeb, text within the brackets disappears. That could be
>     good, bad,
>      >> or of no concern, depending on your circumstances. I don’t know what
>      >> other consequences might be involved with the use of angle
>     brackets, but
>      >> it’s a good idea to test any solution you decide to use to see
>     what the
>      >> effect will be in the reports or sites you use most.
>      >> Kirsten
>      >> -----Original Message-----
>      >> From: Jenny M Benson
>      >> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 7:38 AM
>      >> To: [email protected]
>     <mailto:[email protected]>
>      >> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Advice on name for 'probable' town
>      >> Rob Vader wrote:
>      >> > Hi,
>      >> >
>      >> > I would like the view of the users of this forum on how to
>     register a
>      >> > 'probable' town. So someone is born (ofcourse always....) but
>     it is nopt
>      >> > entirely sure in what town. If I now would note down in Legacy
>     (e.g.)
>      >> > "London?" or soemthing like "prob. London" then it would enter
>     as another
>      >> > town/city than London. That is not what I want. Is there something
>      >> > similare
>      >> > for names of cities like approximate dates? Or how would you
>     advice?
>      >> >
>      >> Personally, I use <London> if I want to indicate a probability.
>      >> --
>      >> Jenny M Benson
>      >>
>      >>
>      >> Legacy User Group guidelines:
>      >> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>      >> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>      >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>      >> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>      >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>      >> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>      >> Follow Legacy on Facebook
>     (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
>      >> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>      >> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>      >
>      >
>      >
>      >Legacy User Group guidelines:
>      >http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>      >Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>      >http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>      >Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>      >http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>      >Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>      >Follow Legacy on Facebook
>     (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog
>     (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>      >To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>      >
>      >
>
>     Legacy User Group guidelines:
>     http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>     Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>     http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>     Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>     http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>     Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>     Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree)
>     and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>     To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to