Tony, As person born in Queensland, Australia, I would say to just use Clermont, Queensland, Australia. Much simpler than having two names for the same place. Yes, Queensland was a colony before Federation in 1901, but only became one after separation from New South Wales in 1859.
Regards, Jennifer http://colston-wenck.com -----Original Message----- From: Tony Rolfe [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, 29 October 2011 4:50 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [LegacyUG] Showing historical locations. What about Clermont, Queensland, Australia vs Clermont, Queensland Colony? Is it worth having two location names for the same place to get historical accuracy or is it better to simplify and forego history? As person born in Queensland, Australia, I would say to just use Clermont, Queensland, Australia. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
