Brian, I installed version 7.5.0.142, build 31 Jan 2012 and verified this problem still exists on my system it appears to still be a bug?
Would you please give the LUG an update on the status of this problem? Thanks, Laird ============== On 5/16/2011 11:42 AM, Brian/Support wrote: > The problem you reported has been tested and is confirmed. A report has > been recorded in our problem tracking system so this can be fixed. Thank > you for helping us make Legacy a better program for everyone. > > In fact I created two problem reports. One for the standalone report and > one for the Publishing Centre. > > Brian > Customer Support > Millennia Corporation > [email protected] > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com > > We are changing the world of genealogy! > When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. > Thanks. > > On 15/05/2011 8:47 PM, Ken wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> Although the following appears to be a minor problem, I thought I should >> bring it to the >> group's attention to see if I am overlooking a solution. I note it has not >> been listed >> in the archives. >> >> When producing a Multiple Line of Descendant Report within the Publishing >> Centre or as a >> stand alone, the Table of Contents are incorrectly numbered. The second >> page and those >> Table of Contents pages that follow are all automatically assigned a page >> number as though >> they were the last page of the whole report. In my case each page, 2 >> through 5, of the >> Table of Contents were assigned page number 312. The last page of my full >> report was >> 311. >> >> As the Table of Contents falls at the beginning of the report I was >> surprised to see it >> numbered as though it fell at the end but realized the problem was more than >> that when all >> the Table of Contents pages, 2 through 5, carried the same incorrect number. >> Have I >> done something wrong or is this a bug? >> >> If someone tries to duplicate this scenario please make sure your Table of >> Contents is two >> or more pages. I tried to see if this situation applied to any other type >> of report but >> my line doesn't go back far enough to have at least two pages of generations >> noted in the >> Table of Contents for the Ancestor or one name Descendant report. >> >> I thank you for reading this and look forward to some guidance with regards >> to the matter. >> >> Ken Marlow, Ottawa >> Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
