I meant on the LOAD side, not on the nFS file generation side. But now that you've stated it that way... hmm. Within Legacy, it is a bother to have everyone say "biological" - if you are using that field and want it to show on reports, you really only want the ones that are not normal. Well, at least that's the way I want it. If everyone has something in both fields, the reports are full/messy with that option on; but with the option off, you don't see adopted relationships. Again... hmm. Thanks for responding. --Paula in Texas Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sanford Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams
________________________________ From: Brian/Support <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Tue, February 7, 2012 3:49:21 PM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Mass edit to Child-Parent Relationships Paula, Since nFS contains the relationship to Father and Relationship to Mother as biological in their data leaving that data out of the transfer to Legacy could also be considered a BUG because not all the available data is transferred. nFS seems to have the biological rel to parents for everyone, I even saw a case where there were biological relationships to multiple parents, even though the help for the relationships says that a blank relationship is assumed to be biological. Brian Customer Support Millennia Corporation [email protected] http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com We are changing the world of genealogy! When replying to this message, please include all previous correspondence. Thanks. On 23/01/2012 10:49 AM, Paula Ryburn wrote: > Did you guys report this as a bug? Just double-checking. It was a bug even >for > GEDCOM import a long time ago (when I started using Legacy... v5?). Would've > thought it would have been fixed 'everywhere' - tho maybe nFS interface wasn't > in place at that time. > --Paula in Texas Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
