It was little things on several different types of sources. I can’t remember exactly. I would look it up in the book and then look at how it was in Legacy and it wouldn’t match exactly. It wasn’t something glaring but small things. However, I wanted my sources to be 100% consistent and inline with the Evidence Explained book so I hand typed them. I do know that the subsequent citations didn’t match exactly either. And then there was a problem with non population scheduled because they don’t have templates for those anyways. I remember there was a problem with state censuses too.
michele From: Paula Ryburn [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2012 4:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 7.5 and source citation import? / controlling subsequent citations Can you share with us which source writer templates produced unsatisfactory citations? Surely, not all of them? And being these two threads are mainly about the "subsequent" citations - was that where the problems were? Thanks. --Paula in Texas Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine Daulton Dinwiddie Doody Ellis Exline Field Floran Floyd Gates Goodale Gordon Gump Hale Harbaugh Hind Hopkins Hughes Hurdle Jones Klein Koyle Laswell McDonald Misner Passwaters Pelton Roberts Roche Ryburn Sanford Short Singer Sullivan Weller Williams Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
