I find it much easier to trace the progression of census appearances on the
individual info page than on Chronology which can seem cluttered.

On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 12:31 PM, R G Strong-genes
<[email protected]>wrote:

>   Michele,
> For my Great Grandmother I entered a 1930 census event under her info and
> the 1940 census event under her and her 2nd Husbands marriage. I then went
> to her and had her highlighted and changed to Chronology tab and both
> events show up 1930 and 1940 Apr 4 is the Census Event listed with the
> details that I put in the note section. Have you checked your chronology
> options? You have to put a check mark to show the events for both sections.
> Russ
>
>  *From:* Michele Lewis <[email protected]>
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 07, 2012 12:09 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [LegacyUG] New Census Tool
>
>
> The one problem with this is it is a lot harder to follow someone through
> the census years this way.  If you enter it as an event under the person,
> every census they appear in will show up on the chronology/timeline.  Doing
> it your way will mean only the census records after they married will show
> up.****
>
> ****
>
> Michele****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>
> *From:* Bob McEwan [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Saturday, April 07, 2012 11:47 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] New Census Tool****
>
> ****
>
> Hi Nancy
>
> Exactly the way I record it and if they remarry they go under the new
> marriage event
>
> Bob
> On 07/04/2012 10:22 AM, Nancy Porter wrote: ****
>
> I, too, place the census event where the husband and wife are together
> under marriage events. If one of them dies or they split and they are
> single again, then subsequent census are placed in their individual event.
> Its much easier for me to follow them.
> nancy
>
> On 4/6/2012 4:26 PM, Bob McEwan wrote: ****
>
> Thanks to Paula and Russ for agreeing with my placement of the census
> under marriage event.
> I feel that if the event contains both husband and wife that's where it
> should be.
>
> Bob
>
> On 06/04/2012 4:04 PM, Paula Ryburn wrote: ****
>
> I record it for the couple. Â Just a preference, I think.
> Â ****
>
> --Paula  ****
>
> ****
>
> ****
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Randy Clark mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Fri, April 6, 2012 2:51:50 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] New Census Tool
>
> Why is a census event under a marriage event?****
>
>  On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Bob McEwan <[email protected]>
> wrote:****
>
> when using the census tool I do a search to exclude individuals from
> search list who appear to be in census but if the census event is under a
> marriage event it does not pick it up and places the individual in the
> list. Has anyone found this problem.
>
> Thanks Bob****
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to