I have chosen to only list the dead on my blog, so anything I publish ends when 
the living generation begins, and to me it's not a matter of privacy but of 
respect for the living.  I am very open about the details of my life, the 
places I've lived, career etc., some of my cousins aren't.  I have just found 
it easier to not offend them by only dealing with the dead in public.  That 
said, when I share a gedcom with others or receive one I really, really, hate 
getting them with 200 "living" people in the index.  I find them of little 
value.  I don't need to know that living has 5 living children.  I don't share 
my personal gedcom's with just anyone because I list everyone in them with all 
the facts and documents I can find.
 
Have a great day! 
Mary Jane  http://allwrappedup4u.blogspot.com/
http://foundingfamilylines.blogspot.com


________________________________
 From: Brian L. Lightfoot <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 12:57 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Question regarding website building


I think this bottle has been passed around many times before. As many of the 
other replies may so indicate, the choice of “Living” over the actual name 
seems to be the politically correct answer. But as what little hair I have left 
grows more grey and my eyes get dimmer, I find myself pondering this over and 
over myself. I can certainly understand omitting just about all details about a 
living person but why is it not prudent to just show their names?
 
Before you answer, consider that their birth is a matter of public record, 
there was probably a newspaper publication naming their parents when they were 
born, probably a wedding announcement giving names of parents, siblings, and 
other relatives published in their local city and elsewhere. Their names are 
easily found by looking in the white pages of a phone book which not only gives 
the phone number but their residential address. Even if you’re not sure of the 
exact names of children then a quick click and visit to Spokeo.com reveals 
quite a bit about the parents including the names of their children.
 
My point is that all this information is readily available and open to the 
public but for some reason the direction that genealogy has taken in the past 
20 years is to hide even their names. Someone tell me why and please do it 
without using the word “privacy” because their lives have all been public so 
far. Just wondering.
 
Brian in CA
 
 
From:Richard Falzini [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2012 3:56 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [LegacyUG] Question regarding website building
 
Hello,
         I have been up dating my web site I have made with Legacy, and at the 
current moment I do not list names, birth dates, marriage dates, etc.
of any living individuals.
 
when the name of a living person should be displayed it says LIVING.
 
I wanted to ask should I keep my site like that, or would it be ok to show the 
name such as Richard Falzini but suppress all personal data from the viewers of 
my site?
 
I look forward to all input regarding my question
 
Thanks
 
Rich


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to