Thanx. So simple - just what I need. Couldn't think thru the forest because of the trees :-)
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 4:36 PM, JLB <[email protected]> wrote: > I think you need two tags there. Tag the first list, (with tag 1, for > instance). Then do a search for direct ancestors and tag those with a > second tag number (tag 2, for instance). Then do a search for > Individuals with Tag 1 and Tag 2. > ---- > JL Beeken > JLog - simple computer technology for genealogists > http://jlog.jgen.ws/ > > On 1/21/2013 1:03 PM, John Roose wrote: >> An example: I have a search list of people born, died, buried in Ohio. >>>From that list of several hundred names, what is the easiest way to >> identify those that are direct ancestors? They are, of course, bold in >> the resulting "Search List" but there has to be an easier way than >> scrolling down and tagging them individually. Suggestions? >> >> Thanx. John >> >> -- >> Geneaolgy - - - - - it's in my blood! >> Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
