I like the below suggestion - obvious in all reports.  But that POSSIBLE
would show up for ALL children and it may only be one child that you are
unsure of.  Another option:
In family view, right click on ANY child
Select CHILDREN'S SETTINGS
Hi-lite the appropriate child
Under RELATIONSHIP TO FATHER (or MOTHER), you can create your own
options - click the down arrow and a new window pops up
Click ADD
Put in POSSIBLE PARENT  (side note - I preface my own manual entries
with a period (.Possible Parent), or you could make them all CAPS or
some such other indicator.  This reminds me that it is not a pre-canned
item.  Since I added it some wordings and such may need tweaking.)

I really wish Legacy allowed us the OPTION of having this box come up on
every child add (just like the Marriage window auto-pops up when adding
a spouse).  This way we could remember to set if it is a "blood-line"
(Biological) child or some other relationship.

I also wish this would show up in the child's listing on Family View (as
an option).  You'd think that going to OPTIONS, CUSTOMIZE, VIEW, SHOW
STATUS ON FAMILY VIEW would cause this to happen, but it doesn't.  And I
think I ran into a report or two where I wish this could optionally show
up - but I could be wrong about that.

Do not get RELATIONSHIP TO xxx mixed up with CHILD STATUS that is also
on this screen.  Use CHILD STATUS for something that pertains ONLY to
the child (twin, still-born, etc).  (I originally was putting
"guardianship" in the CHILD STATUS field, but that ended up not working
well because it implied that relationship for both parents.)

Bob


On 06/15/2013 12:39, Eliz Hanebury wrote:
> I use Possibly as part of the first name, cheap and easy to figure <G>
>
> Eliz
> Not Today and Not without a Fight
> (Anon)
>
> For all that has been, thanks.
> For all that will be, yes.
>     (Dag Hammarskjold)
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Jane Sarles <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>     Geoff,
>
>     Excited to see the new version and it's looking super.  If I  may
>     make a suggestion- someday I should like to see an enhancement
>     that would solve many problems for me:  I have several ancestors
>     for whom I have POSSIBILITIES as their parent - but nothing set in
>     stone.  Is it not possible to have a category of "parent
>     possibility" or some such name, which would link to an ancestor
>     SEVERAL people as prospective fathers or mothers?  It would need
>     to have an option to print or not print of course, so that a print
>     out might say:
>
>     Candidates for the father of Joe Jones are:
>           Jim Jones (RIN#), born 1744, etc., etc.
>           Jerry Jones (RIN)#, died 1682 in Portugal, etc. etc.
>           Jeffrey Jones, (RIN#)  living next to Joe in the 1800 census.
>
>     I realize that it is possible to manually type in the above
>     information, but when I haven't worked on a person for a while, it
>     would be helpful for research to review the possibilities. It
>     would seem (to someone who knows nothing whatever about
>     programming and development) that links to several persons who MAY
>     be parents could be done.  Something I have needed for a long,
>     long, time.
>
>     Thanks for listening.
>
>     Jane Sarles
>
>
>
>     On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Geoff Rasmussen
>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>
>         Here's the next article:
>
>         
> http://news.legacyfamilytree.com/legacy_news/2013/06/legacy-family-tree-8-revealed-qa.html
>
>         Thanks,
>         Geoff Rasmussen
>         Millennia Corporation
>         [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>         www.LegacyFamilyTree.com <http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/>
>
>
>         Legacy User Group guidelines:
>         http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>         Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>         http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>         Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>         http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>         Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>         Follow Legacy on Facebook
>         (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog
>         (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>         To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
>     Legacy User Group guidelines:
>     http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>     Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>     http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>     Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>     http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>     Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>     Follow Legacy on Facebook
>     (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog
>     (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>     To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree)
> and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to