This cuts to the heart of the matter, and I agree with the request. -----Original Message----- >From: Boyd Miller <[email protected]> >Sent: Jun 21, 2013 5:05 AM >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] marriages > > This highlights the need to be able to source these two parts of the >"fact" separately. >Boyd >On 21/06/2013 1:17 p.m., Tony Rolfe wrote: >> Can we go back to the original request and forget about all the >> extraneous waffle which has appeared on this subject. Just because >> Legacy must create a "marriage" record whenever a child is added to a >> parent, it doesn't mean that a real-world marriage actually occurred. >> >> It is frequently easy to tell that a person never married. It is >> usually impossible to state with any certainty that someone had no children. >> >> Can we please split the "This person never married and had no children" >> fact into two separate facts? >> >> Thanks >> >> >> Tony
Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
