Gregory,
First, thanks for the great explanation of why you are seeking to move from 
FTM.  I think you have a good grasp on the problems involved.

One of the reasons I began to use Legacy after examining many genealogical 
programs was that Legacy is based on a Microsoft Access database.  To me that 
meant that I could look at the underlying tables outside of Legacy.  The 
program also allows data to be exported easily to CSV formated files which then 
can be imported into a spreadsheet.  You can customize the GEDCOM import so 
that unusual fields are mapped to something in Legacy.  You can add new event 
types to receive imported elements.  There is a good set of instructions for 
importing data from FTM or other programs.  The database can be searched on any 
combination of fields both inside the program and with SQL.  The basic program 
is free so you can experiment.  I have used Legacy for about 16 years.  I still 
check FTM and others to see if they develop new features.  Legacy releases 
frequent free updates to the program.  The interface with Family Search Family 
Tree is working well.  An
 online user group is very active and helpful in solving questions.  I hope we 
see you soon.
Ron Taylor - a satisfied Legacy user


________________________________
 From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 11:15 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Legacy v8 Research




I’m a long-time Family Tree Maker user who has just been invited to ‘find 
another product’ by Ancestry’s sales and development representatives.  After 
many years of problems and misconceptions, it has become clear that FTM will 
not be a serious genealogical research product for many years to come, if ever. 
 My question for the members of this board is:  Is Legacy the product I need?  
You see, I am faced with a massive data re-entry project if I switch because 
GEDCOM does not support the two reasons I’ve used FTM in the first place: 1) 
understanding a citation footnote as a separate, manageable entity; 2) the 
linking of Ancestry text and media image downloads direct from Ancestry.com.  
(There are a number of other smaller discrepancies, as well.)
 
The main problem I have with FTM is that I cannot get my data out of their 
database. What I can get is so limited that I can’t filter it or sort it 
efficiently.  I can’t create reports that allow me to include any Facts 
(datapoints) in any order.  There are hosts of restrictions on report record 
count quantity, numbers of pages allowed, size of paper output per report type, 
etc.  The FTM database has very little intelligence built into it and little or 
no attention has been paid by FTM’s developers to the requirements of physical 
world research, such as cemeteries, court house records, etc.  FTM’s database 
doesn’t ‘see’ the elements of a record beyond text string (with rare 
exceptions, such as nicknames).  In the context of a datapoint, it doesn’t know 
the difference between Lancaster, PA (the city) and Lancaster County, PA – to 
FTM, these are just ‘places.’
 
Examples:  Let’s say that I’ve procured information that a relative lived 
someplace known as ‘Lancaster’ somewhere in the U.S.  There is no indication of 
state or county, city or township.  I would like to be able to query my 
database for all surnames similar to the individual in question as well as all 
entries where the term ‘Lancaster’ appears.  Or, how about burials?  All of you 
seasoned cemetery researchers know about how family plots work, how women have 
traditionally changed their names to that of their husbands, how multiple 
marriages influenced where someone may have been buried, etc.  I need to create 
a burial report where I can call out individuals who may have been related to 
those I am actively seeking in case I run across their markers (or records) 
while performing onsite ‘field work.’  I need to be able to compare what I 
discover with what I have (or don’t have) currently in my database.  Or, I need 
to be able to
 see pedigrees of individuals as mini-Ahnentafels for the reason of researching 
multiple relationships, leading to discoveries of additional family members 
(where I come from, the marriage of the great-nephew of a brother to that 
brother’s sister’s granddaughter is not uncommon!).
 
In short, I’m looking for an application that does not restrict the querying 
and exporting of my raw database data in ANY WAY.  I want to be able to write 
my own reporting ‘front end’ from an export of the data (preferably, Excel).  
Is Legacy v8 the product that will do this for me?  Thanks in advance to all 
who respond.
 
Regards,
 
Gregory Winters

Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to