On 11/30/2013 2:08 PM, Larry Lee wrote: > Gene, > > I would agree with Paul since it is assumed that we do not know the birth > order of children with blank dates, therefore alphabetic is preferred. > > IF you know the birth order of one or more of the children with blank birth > dates you have a couple options: 1/ Order them manually and DO NOT use the > auto-sort feature or 2/ use about, circa or between birth dates to keep them > in the correct birth order, then you can still use the auto-sort feature. > > I prefer option 2 since it tells me that I know the birth order but I still > need to find the exact date. > > Larry Lee > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > > >
Larry, I have no idea what you are talking about. I was talking about EVENT sorting. That has no connection to Child sorting. -- Gene Young Researching Young, Harer, Cox & Sallada With Legacy Family Tree http://myyoungs.atspace.com/index.htm --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
