Pam, Please indulge me to talk about Location in Legacy 8. Actually, little has changed since Legacy 7 but many users do not have a strategy for locations and mapping and such.
--> One of the major changes (and it is rather minor) for L8 is that the GeoDB is now unified. Instead of picking and choosing which regions you want, you get to install a file that has all regions. The file is a large download but it is about the same size as the program installer file so it should be no more of a problem to download. Everyone should want to download and install this for L8. Legacy has 2 tools for Geo Coding your locations. Unfortunately, both operate, more or less, based on current place names, not historical place names. The strategy I use for a historical name is to determine what the name of the place is now and use the Bing map to find it. And, if that does not work, try to find it with the GeoDB. ---> The GeoDB can be made to format the name of a location with great flexibility using the GeoCode-alt.txt files, but that is another lessone.... ;-) Then, if found, go back to the Bing Map to use more precise right click placement. --> Sometimes, neither works. This is when I go to Wikipedia or Google to have one of them try to show me where the place is. Then "transfer" those coordinates to Legacy. I will make a lot of use of the Bing satellite views to try to place the pin at the most favorable location. Once I have the location resolved, I will then create a new location with the historical name, prefixed by the current name. When editing the name, I check the box that says do not automatically geocode. Then I go to the present day location, showing the pin where the place is, then move to historical named place and right click the pin to the same place. Then edit the location to remove the prefix new name which I only added so the two places were next to each other in the place list. This may sound confusing, but once you have done it once or twice it becomes easy. And you can figure out shortcuts to the process. I have done 1000s of locations using these techniques. Please note that the Bing maps can give a more precise location than the GeoDB. But the GeoDB is a great tool for assuring that the location name is constructed correctly and all of the parts are spelled correctly. For most US, Canada, and UK locations, the less info you give Bing, the better it does. IE, adding a county will often confuse it. For US, it keys off of City and state. OK? Do you have more questions? john. At 12:25 PM 12/3/2013, Pam Gosling wrote: >Hello, > >I there any recommended format to list locations >for the older Prussian now Pommeranian areas of >former Germany now Poland? Iâm new to this, >and in the archives from 2010, it seems that it >is not possible for the Geobase to properly >identify these locations?  So, if this is true, are these my only options?: > >1. Just not use the geobase feature and >list the location as well as possible? >2. Look up lat/long date from online maps >and insert to program? Or does that even work? >3. Another idea? >4. If I do add lat/long to database, does >that get saved for others to use? Or just my file? > >If there is no way to use this mapping feature >for international locations, is there a standard >recommended format for myself to list, just so I have the proper format anyway: > >For example: > >Zeitlitz, Kreis Regenwalde, Pommerania, Prussia (old German ) > >Which is now in: > >( town Polish not yet translated), >Resko(Regenwalde), Lobez(âlike countyâ >missing the Poland diacritical mark), Poland > >e.g. should I write either the (old) or >new/current names in parentheses/inside >brackets, with hyphens, or only list the current >names and describe older German names in notes or something? Or what? > >And, is there a way to import the Polish >diacritical letters(?right way to describe >them?); they are not included in the options I >can click on. When I tried to paste one to the >family name in the address location field, it didnât keep the mark. > >I want to write the locations in such a way so >that in the future if the mapping function for >international locations ever comes about, I >donât want to have to rewrite all of these. > >And, Iâm assuming this applies to both >âeventsâ such as residence, and the address >field for births, deaths, etc? Or would that make a difference? > >Thanks so much for all the gracious help on this list; very appreciated. Pam > > > > > >Legacy User Group guidelines: >http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp >Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: >http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: >http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ >Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp >Follow Legacy on Facebook >(http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and >on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). >To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
