But then it wouldn't be compliant with Gedcom standard
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 6:30 PM, Gavin Nicholson <gavn...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Yes that is true but the point is that it would be preferable for Legacy > to simply output a single source which looks the footnote/endnote citation > we see in the program. > > > > Gavin... > > > > *From:* Jay 1FamilyTree [mailto:1familytree....@gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, 6 December 2013 12:04 PM > *To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com > *Subject:* Re: Sourewriter and gedcoms, was RE: Exporting Shared Events > [WAS: Re: [LegacyUG] Shared vital Events] > > > > [snip] > > > > Looks like the gedcom output is doing what is expected of it. > > > > Jay > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and > on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
