Syble,

I agree with everything you said, except I don't think Family Search Trees
will be sold since they are produced by the LDS church.

Larry Lee
[email protected]



On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Syble Glasscock <[email protected]>wrote:

> *Yes, Family Search is now free, and I've greatly benefited by their
> website and work, I've volunteered some, but, I too am frustrated with
> their trees, just as I am with ancestry.com <http://ancestry.com> trees, so
> many duplications and so many errors, it's a daunting task trying to get
> the corrections made.  *
> *Many of us also have spent many hours adding to Findagrave, yes it too is
> free, but for how long, as many of your know it's now been sold to
> Ancestry.com. My fear is that Family Search will also be sold, so I've
> decided it's not worth the effort and I've added very little to Findagrave
> since I heard of the sale, I've gained much from that website also.  I'm
> all about helping and  even paying for sponsorship of  pages or trees, but
> having others to pay for what I've freely given is not fair in my opinion.*
> *Syble*
>
>
>   On Saturday, December 14, 2013 11:02 PM, Paul Gray <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Bryan,
>
> I sometimes get frustrated with the quality of FS Family Tree data, but it
> is what it is. It will only get cleaned up if we do it, no one else will.
>
> The main reason I correct and merge records of my ancestors is that I want
> the data on my ancestors to be correct and widely available for future
> generations. I believe Family Search to be the best bet to be a system that
> is maintained and available indefinitely. And it is free to all. I am not
> LDS so I don’t use any of the ordinance tracking.
>
> It will take time. I’m only looking at direct ancestors (grandparents) for
> now. No uncles, aunts, cousins etc. Yet.
>
> I’m in no rush. When it gets overwhelming, I remember the old saying. “How
> do you eat an elephant?”. “One bite at a time.”.
>
> But, there are many who feel as you do. Just uncheck options 1.8 and 1.9
> and you won’t even know it’s there.
>
> Paul Gray
>
> *From:* Bryan Pratt [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* December-14-13 8:46 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Cc:* Legacy
> *Subject:* [LegacyUG] Family Search and Legacy
>
> After ploughing along for some hours (a lot of hours) working with my
> Legacy family file and Family Search’s database, I’ve decided I’m not going
> to do Family Search’s work of spending copious hours of cleaning up their
> rubbishy data collection.
> I started out hoping to help FS - I have benefitted from a lot of their
> data - and then to also pick up more data for my own family file.
> But no longer am I going to trawl through for example 15 odd Margaret’s
> because they could be duplicates of my (already surnamed ) Margaret.  The
> FS database needs to be cleaned out of idiotic entries like using the
> above: e.g  “Margaret, born, such and such date. Is yours the same?”, when
> you have already inputted that she was born in Ireland and married in USA.
>
> The FS program is so user unfriendly. No ability to copy/paste for edit
> fields (except keyboard), the merge colours are hopeless to differentiate,
> the continuous re-check of duplicates is so time consuming; to name but a
> few.
>
> I’m not an LDS member, and I feel we are being used to sort their agenda.
> Somehow in this amalgam of Legacy and Family Search, I feel I’ve ended up
> being a servant of the LDS to further their end.
>
> The Legacy Family Tree software and the religious agenda need to be
> separated.
>
> Bryan
> NZ
>
> Sent from Windows Mail
>
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com/
> Version: 2014.0.4259 / Virus Database: 3658/6921 - Release Date: 12/14/13
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Etiquette.asp>
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/Help.asp>
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.legacyfamilytree.com/).
> To unsubscribe: 
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp<http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/LegacyLists.asp>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to