I can confirm - starting position direct line person not bold when viewed
as 1/2 sibling but bold when viewed as full sibling
but on a different family direct line person is bold regardless of if 1/2
or full sibling view


On 21 December 2013 17:33, Kurt Kneeland <[email protected]>wrote:

> Yes.  I see that also.  I have several that are bolded even when in the ½
> relationship status.  Only one that isn’t and that one is the starting
> person.
>
>
>
> *From:* Kirsty M. Haining [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Saturday, December 21, 2013 1:03 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [LegacyUG] possible bug direct line bolding
>
>
>
> I just found an instance where the bolding WAS working in the half-kid
> position, so this is not happening consistently every time…
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Kirsty M. Haining [mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>]
>
> *Sent:* Friday, December 20, 2013 9:51 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [LegacyUG] possible bug direct line bolding
>
>
>
> I’m not sure if this is a bug in Legacy 8 or not.  I noticed today that
> the direct line bolding for one of my ancestors did not show up if that
> ancestor happened to be in the “half kid” position.  In other words, I did
> not see the bolding on my direct-line ancestor unless both direct-line
> parents were in the family view.  If only one parent was my direct-line
> ancestor, and the other parent was from another marriage of my direct-line
> ancestor (and thus the descendant, my direct-line ancestor, showed up in
> the “half kids” view), then my descendant/child/direct-line ancestor shows
> up in normal font (rather than bolded).  I hope I’m being clear in my
> description.  Is this a new bug?
>
>
>
> Btw, I no longer have a file that I can test to see if this also happened
> in Legacy 7.5.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kirsty Haining
>
> Seattle, Washington
>
> J
>
>
>
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
> Legacy User Group guidelines:
> http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
> Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
> Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
> Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
> on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
> To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>



Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to