I'm sure gonna recheck the sources, but if the dates I have are correct (rather than merely entered to match what I was given) these are both accurate reports.
In the listing of longest-lived bet 1800 and 1899, the 109-yr-old male b 1870 d aft 1908; 1900-1999 is the female 102 yo. But in the by-gender breakdown,there's a 104-yo female 1872-1976. Not to mention, I'm sure I have more than 7 deathdates between 1900 and 1999 ... Sadistics. You gotta love 'em. Cheryl Kathy Thompson wrote: > then locate those people in your file by clicking on the > relevant age in the statistics report and check / verify the > dates - perhaps you entered a date slightly wrong > It's easy enough done and easy enough fixed > > > On 12 February 2014 11:37, singhals <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I'm unpersuaded I have anyone in here who was 109 yrs 11 mos > and 3 days old when he died in the 1800s; I'm a bit dubious > of the 1900s fellow who was 102 6 mos 8 days, too. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
