I was NOT expecting this to be a many-diastered multi-year
project, thus erroneously hypothesized that a statement on
RIN 1 saying "Unless otherwise sourced, all data is from the
book" would work.  So, no, generally there are/were no
sources assigned.  When I validated the info I copied it
into NOTES, and moved on.  But, yes, ok maybe I can use that
absence to help...

The entire file was assigned a source "2009 PAF db" when I
moved it into Legacy.

Thanks!

R G Strong-genes wrote:
> Cheryl,
> If you did not assign a source to those individuals you keyed in then there
> is no way of doing what you are asking other then to do the page by page
> look up. However, if you did assign a source then you could just tag all
> those individuals or marriages that are assigned that master source. Once
> you have done that, then you could do an advanced search:
> What to search>individual
> how to search>  not equal to which ever tag you assigned to the ones that
> had the source.
>
> That should give you a list of those that you didn't source the book. You
> could then assign them a different tag number that you can then look them up
> to see if they are in the book or not.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: singhals
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 5:42 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [LegacyUG] ISO labor-lite suggestions re tagging
>
> Database/familyfile of ~15,000 persons and  5100 marriages.
> ORIGINALLY created by keying in the contents of a genealogy
> book.  First done in PAF5, then ported to Legacy 7 and then
> to 8.
>
> Everyone in the book ought to be in the db/ff.
> Unfortunately, while documenting those people, I've added
> people who should have been in the book but aren't
> (siblings, children, parents).
>
> It's too late to tell me I should've thought of this sooner,
> so we can skip that part of the class.
>
> I need a *quick* way to tag maybe 25% in the db/ff who
> aren't in the book.
>
> I /can/ hypothetically sit here with the book in one hand
> and page through it again finding and tagging those people.
>    I suspect the Galaxy will atrophy before I could finish
> that because apparently I have to have the person in the
> "primary" position to click a tag. 5 marriages took close to
> 2 hours.
>
> I considered the "tag family", but that'll end up tagging
> everyone, including a sibling and descendants who aren't in
> the book.
>
> I can find /some/ by the omission of the import source. That
> won't help the ones added prior to moving it into Legacy.
> Ideas welcomed here.
>
> Cheryl




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to