Yes that's right.

You only use Gedcoms to transfer to an earlier
version of Legacy or another program or website, like Ancestry.

Cathy

At 06:18 PM 28/04/2014, you wrote:
>Dear Cathy
>
>Thank you for your response and its clarity.
>
>I assume he would import as a Legacy file and not a gedcom?
>
>With thanks
>
>Anne
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Cathy Pinner
>Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 6:56 PM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Two files
>
>Hi Anne,
>
>Let me see if I understand what he is wanting to do.
>
>He has 3 files.
>
>1) His original file
>
>2) The file of his new contact
>
>3) The new file he created to make sense of the new data.
>
>He is now wanting to combine 1 & 3 as 1 has other lines as well?
>
>So the answer is to import 3 into 1 and then do a
>merge of the people who are the same.
>
>Depending on the new file, it may be easier to
>delete the branch from the original file (File 1)
>and import File 3 to take the place of that
>branch. Once imported the links can be made
>between the people in the two files and any
>remaining duplicates merged. If there are a lot
>of duplicate people and he wants to replace the
>originals with the ones from File 3 then that
>would be the simplest way. However if he wants
>some information from the person in File 1 and
>some from the same person in File 3 then you have
>to use the merge dialogue and choose which bits of each you want.
>
>The main thing is to do a backup of each file
>before you start - and make sure you can restore
>them (remember to give the file a new name so it
>doesn't overwrite the original file). Then it
>doesn't matter what happens with the importing
>and merging as you can start again. There's
>nothing like doing a merge to learn how best to do it.
>
>One trick is to make sure to use the option on
>importing a file to start the RINs at a much
>higher number than the RINs in the original file.
>Then during the merge you can easily tell who
>comes from which file. It also helps you decide
>whether the pair presented are the same person
>and need to be merged. If they come from the same
>file, they probably are not duplicates and can be skipped.
>
>Once you've finished the import and merge you can
>use the Tools Renumber RINs to get rid of gaps in the RINs.
>
>I'm not sure what your concern is re the merge.
>You can choose which information you keep and
>with the main name you can choose to make the
>variant an AKA and with vital event dates that
>are different you can choose to keep both by
>choosing to make one an Alt. Event eg Alt.
>Birth.  A little square is next to the field name
>for names, dates and locations. Clicking on it
>gives you options of what to do with the data
>that hasn't been chosen with the radio button.
>
>The merge shouldn't lose data. There is a problem
>I think with merging identical individual special
>events in that the sources are not necessary
>merged. In the situation you are describing, that
>probably is not going to be an issue.
>
>As I said, the best way to find out what can be
>done is to do it. If you have proper backups, you
>can always abandon what you've done and start again.
>
>Cathy
>
>At 02:58 PM 28/04/2014, you wrote:
> >Hello
> >
> >I am attempting to assist a friend who has
> >Legacy. I am not at all conversant with Merging,
> >single instances only, or importing a file either gedcom or legacy
> >database.
> >
> >Recently he was contacted by someone who is of
> >the same tree as him with European roots.
> >
> >On looking at his tree and theirs and the large
> >numbers of surname variants, some of which he
> >had no record of and he therefore decided to start a new database.
> >
> >There were several cases of same surnames
> >marrying with a few years of each other and
> >varying other issues dates etc. which again led
> >him to believe he needed to begin
> >again with a separate tree to assist him to sort them all out.
> >
> >Having now finished this (and finding out he had
> >connected his own line to one of the many same
> >name marriages) he now has a correct tree in
> the “new‬ file.
> >
> >His problem is how does he get the new file into his own tree.
> >
> >I have read the Merge files section of help and
> >feel this may not solve the problem as I am not
> >sure that this will cope with the differences, particularly with the names.
> >
> >I hope my explanation is clear enough and would
> >appreciate any advice regarding this problem.
> >
> >
> >Anne Wiltshire
> >QLD Australia
>
>
>
>
>Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on
>our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
>
>
>
>
>Legacy User Group guidelines:
>http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
>Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
>http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
>Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
>Follow Legacy on Facebook
>(http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and
>on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
>To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


Reply via email to