Do some of your tagged individuals also have AKAs? Doesn’t sound right that a GEDCOM would include those instead of counting only “unique” individuals but that is why the GEDCOM standard is anything but standard.
Brian in CA From: Cliff Gittens [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2014 12:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [LegacyUG] Record Counts I have a puzzling situation and was hoping someone might be able to help. I tagged 32,229 records with tag #9. These records all have the same source and citation which is why they were tagged. I did a search, subsequent to the tagging of all individuals with the Tag #9. The result was 32,229 records, as it should be. I then created a Gedcom selecting all individuals with the Tag set at #9. When the Gedcom finished it reported 32,250 individuals in the Gedcom file. There is a difference of 21 individuals?? The puzzle is why would these individual counts be different? Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
