I have an ancestor from early Virginia, Timothy Redding. He is found in early records along with others, Francis, John, William, Arthur, etc. Their relationship is not named and there is no clue as to what it may be. I know that I can put those other guys in as unlinked people, but they will not show up when I study my data and am trying to fit clues together as to who Timothy's parents or brothers are. Am I correct in thinking that it is not possible to have the other Redding men to show up in family view or individual chart (which is what I use to do my major work and thought.) If they are in as 'unlinked"? I seldom think to go to the list of unlinked people to compare with data I am discovering as I research.
Wondering how others handle this? Jane Sarles Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
