Have a look at Asa Clark Brown in the Sample family.  He has two sets of
parents.  Your adopted person could probably be the same.
Boyd
On 13/11/2014 10:40 a.m., Jenny M Benson wrote:
> On 12/11/2014 19:58, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
>> I just came across a little problem in my family file that I’ve never
>> had to deal with before. It involves adopted children… which I’ve
>> handled before but in this case it involves the adoption by a sister of
>> the baby of a brother. In other words, both the natural parents and the
>> adopting parents are in my family. Naturally I enter the child as being
>> born to the natural parents but how do I show the child with the
>> adopting parents (other than through notes)? If I try to enter a new
>> child to the adopting parents as a “link to an existing daughter”, the
>> Legacy tells me that the child is already a child of another family and
>> if I want to add as a child to this family also. I think that is what I
>> should do and then change the child’s settings to “Adopted” (for the
>> adopted parents only).  But now, do I change the surname of the child to
>> the new adopted parents’ names especially since her name appears that
>> way in all future documents. I think this would be the correct way but
>> I’m wondering if I haven’t missed an obvious better method or might I be
>> accidentally creating an endless loop of relationships.
> I would handle it just as you describe.
>> And just some other wild thoughts, if I do change the adopted daughters
>> surname, Legacy will change the surname of the daughter shown with the
>> natural parents (after all, both listings of the daughter have the same
>> RIN). But at the same time, it just seems weird to look at the family of
>> the natural parents and then to see their daughter listed with a
>> different surname.
>>
> You just need to decide which name to giver has the "main one" and which
> one to use as the AKA.
>
> My daughter was not adopted by her step-father, but took his surname a
> couple of years after our marriage and has used it ever since - about 30
> years.  I have put that name as the AKA and left her birth surname as
> the main one because it's the one which matches her parents and the one
> which is on her birth certificate.
>




Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to