Thanks Ward. I'll just do the clean up of what amounts to full footnotes.
Barbara
----- Original Message -----
From: Ward Walker
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Source clean up problem
Last I checked (a couple of years ago now), Legacy supported subsequent
citations for footnotes but not for endnotes. Even for footnotes, there were
some issues. The fields that get suppressed are not always what you expect.
Some people were putting data in alternate template fields, as a workaround. My
testing was with SourceWriter. I don’t think that the concept exists for Basic
sources. You can see immediately in the output preview on the Assigned Sources
window. This has nothing to do with your Gedcom, other than the fact that any
export to Gedcom has to squash all sources into a basic style.
Ward
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
