On 29/01/2015 21:07, Kathy Meyer wrote: > Let's not do this folks. Let's end this thread since it has been asked and > answered:-) I don't think Charani intended to offend. I think she was > pointing out why Legacy isn't able to make the change at this time. The > expense (time, money etc.) would be significant. Any business must make > those decisions based on the amount of need there is for a particular > product, right? She didn't say she didn't 'want' it; she said she didn't > 'need' it - much different and not an offensive connotation IMO. I think > she was merely pointing out that one person wanting it and another not > would negate either choice. Since this is such a sensitive subject, we > should all choose to assume anything stated was intended in a non offensive > manner. I totally understand why you feel that way. If something were to > be overtly offensive, the moderators can take it up privately with the > offender.
Thank you Kathy :) You read what I said exactly the way it was intended. -- Charani (UK) OPC for Walton, Ashcott, Shapwick, Greinton and Clutton, SOM http://wsom-opc.org.uk Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
