That's not available at this time, but it is on our suggestion list.

If you'd like to send in your suggestion as well, please use the form on
our website www.LegacyFamilyTree.com > Help Center, also linked to through
the "Make a Suggestion" link in the Support section of the Legacy Home tab.

Sincerely,
Sherry
Technical Support
Legacy Family Tree

On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Brian L. Lightfoot <
[email protected]> wrote:

> I think you’ve misunderstood my post  in that I wanted to be able to print
> out a report that ONLY detailed these special history notes. Your mention
> of the fact that the Location Index allows them to printed is true but at
> the expense of also printing out every other location referenced in the
> entire report.  And there are other undesirable side effects that can
> happen using the Location Index. If your note about a location is only a
> brief sentence or two, then the Location Index maintains an appearance that
> is acceptable. But a lot of us may have added lengthy notes about locations
> that are several paragraphs or longer. When that happens in a Location
> Index as you suggest, then the appearance starts to look like anything but
> an Index.
>
>
>
> For example, I have some lengthy notes about how certain towns or counties
> got their names, especially when they were named after a person in my
> family file. A lot of these notes talk about the early history of the
> location, who the first settlers were, and what happened after my
> particular relative moved into the area. In some descriptions, these notes
> are one and two pages long.  I’ve looked at such output in the Location
> Index and the very mixed appearance of the info being presented is not
> anything I would want to forward to a relative.
>
>
>
> It is for that reason that I wanted to be able to print out a Location
> Report that contained just these special locations. Using the Location
> Report, I can even sort out the locations by State or County so that notes
> about locations within the same geographic area would tend to stay
> together.  I’ve waffled back and forth about including these occasional
> lengthy notes in the General Notes of a person or a marriage but I
> sometimes I feel as if they just don’t belong there because they don’t
> directly address the genealogical aspects of the family and are more
> closely tied solely to the history of the location. As the OP indicated,
> this historical information usually applies to more than one member of the
> family so you can’t make an arbitrary decision as to whom the notes would
> be included. And this is why I say that there is no easy way to obtain a
> clean looking Location Report without lots of effort to tag those
> locations. Just because one can include the notes in a Location Index
> doesn’t make that a good method.
>
>
>
> Brian in CA
>




Legacy User Group guidelines:

http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/

Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com

Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our 
blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com).

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp

Reply via email to