Because someone there is little to no proof that a marriage took place when a marriage did in fact take place. While it is true that you can't link a source to a marriage you can link a source to a relationship. FamilySearch FamilyTree is designed to be a living tree that changes.
On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Jenny M Benson <[email protected]> wrote: > On 17/11/2015 14:12, Brian/Support wrote: > > The difficulty comes because FamilySearch does not allow you to link a > > source to a marriage, > > Does anyone know WHY FS doesn't require Sources for marriages? What's > to stop people adding marriages where they have little or no proof that > such a marriage took place? > > > > -- > Jenny M Benson > > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com > > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and > on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://support.legacyfamilytree.com Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
