Gene Thanks, that is what I needed Pete
> On Sep 12, 2016, at 2:55 PM, Gene Wheeler <bridge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The New England Historic Genealogical Society, in a book entitled "Guide To > Genealogical Writing", says to use exactly five (5) underscores for an > unknown name. Thus, I recently did a mass change of the use of "Unknown" to > the five underscores in Legacy. For one thing, this makes the fact stand out > that the name is not known when scanning a list of names, or otherwise. > > Gene > ========= > > > >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Pete Beatty <pete.bea...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am a little confused on how to properly identify a missing portion of a >> Name. I have numerous entries were the current person’s name partially >> known. Is there a accepted identifier that can be used to signify >> “UNKNOWN”? I currently use “Unknown” for either portion of the name. >> >> >> -- >> >> LegacyUserGroup mailing list >> LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com >> To manage your subscription and unsubscribe >> http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com >> Archives at: >> http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ > > -- > > LegacyUserGroup mailing list > LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com > To manage your subscription and unsubscribe > http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com > Archives at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
-- LegacyUserGroup mailing list LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com To manage your subscription and unsubscribe http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com Archives at: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
